0
$\begingroup$

I am trying to find the general solution to the Schrodinger equation with a time-dependent Hamiltonian:

$$ i \frac{\partial}{\partial t}| \psi(t) \rangle = H(t) | \psi(t) \rangle.$$

My Hamiltonian evolves over time but it remains Hermitian, so at any given time $t$ I have an orthonormal basis of eigenstates $ \{ |\psi_n(t) \rangle \}$ where

$$H(t)|\psi_n (t) \rangle= E_n(t) |\psi_n(t) \rangle.$$

My starting point to solve the Schrodinger equation would be to expand my state $|\psi(t) \rangle$ in an orthonormal basis. I will choose my basis to be the eigenstates of $H(0)$, i.e. the set $\{ |\psi_n(0) \rangle \}$, so I have

$$ |\psi(t) \rangle = \sum_n c_n(t) |\psi_n(0) \rangle $$

What if I wanted to expand $| \psi(t) \rangle$ in terms of the time-dependent eigenstates $\{ |\psi_n(t) \rangle \}$ at some arbitary non-zero time? Well I know how these states evolve so I can relate them to $\{ |\psi_n(0) \rangle \} $: the states $\{ | \psi_n(t) \rangle \} $ solve the Schrodinger equation as

$$ i \frac{\partial}{\partial t} |\psi_n(t) \rangle = H(t) |\psi_n(t) \rangle \\ = E_n(t) |\psi_n(t)\rangle \\ \Rightarrow |\psi_n(t)\rangle=\exp \bigg(-i\int_0^tE_n(t')dt' \bigg)|\psi_n(0)\rangle $$

Which gives me the relationship between $\{ |\psi_n(0) \}$ and $\{ |\psi_n(t) \rangle \}$. I can invert this to find

$$ |\psi_n(0)\rangle = \exp \bigg(i\int_0^tE_n(t')dt' \bigg)|\psi_n(t)\rangle. $$

Substuting this into my expression for $|\psi(t)\rangle$, I have

$$ |\psi(t) \rangle = \sum_n c_n(t)\exp \bigg(i\int_0^tE_n(t')dt' \bigg)|\psi_n(t)\rangle $$

On page 346 of Sakurai's Modern Quantum Mechanics, eq. (5.6.5), he has expanded the general solution $|\psi(t)\rangle$ just like this but the integral phase has a minus sign out the front. I do not see where I have gone wrong in my reasoning above. The following analysis in Sakurai's book to prove the Adiabatic theorem requires the minus sign to work so I would very much like some hints! Thank you in advance.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Which edition? What year? $\endgroup$ – Qmechanic Oct 11 '18 at 11:46
  • $\begingroup$ The second edition international version published in 2011 by Pearson. $\endgroup$ – Matt0410 Oct 11 '18 at 12:30
2
$\begingroup$

You assume that

$i \frac{d}{d t} \psi_n(t) = H(t) \psi_n(t) \ , $

which is not true. I think the confusion arises because of the notation for $\psi_n(t)$, which are often called the instantaneous eigenstates. Let's choose the notation $\psi_{n,\tau}$, solving:

$H(\tau) \psi_{n,\tau} = E_{n,\tau} \psi_{n,\tau} \ .$

Now of course we may find solutions $\psi_{n,\tau}(s)$ to the time-dependent Schrödinger problem

$i \frac{d}{d t} \psi_{n,\tau}(t) = H(s) \psi_{n,\tau}(t) \ \ \ \ , \ \psi_{n,\tau}(0) = \psi_{n,\tau} \ ,$

But the Schrödinger equation does not govern the dependence of $\psi_{n,\tau}$ on the parameter $\tau$ ( which i have chosen to be a greek letter, to stress that it's role is very different from the time $t$).

The set $\{\psi_{n,\tau}\}_n$ is a basis like any other basis, so one may expand the vector at time $t$ in this basis using time-dependent coefficients $\tilde{c}_n(t)$:

$\psi(t) = \sum_n \tilde{c}_n(t) \psi_{n,\tau} \ . $

But this doesn't really bring an advantage in solving the Schrödinger problem, because the $\psi_{n\tau}$ are not eigenvectors of $H(t)$ for $t \neq \tau$.

What you did is expanding $\psi(t)$ in the instantaneous eigenstates $\psi_{n,t}$ as

$\psi(t) = \sum_n c_n(t) \psi_{n,t}$.

Now acting with $H(t)$ gives

$H(t) \psi(t) = \sum_n E_{n,t} c_n(t) \psi_{n,t} \ .$

However, now the time-derivative acting on $\psi(t)$ is more complicated:

$i \frac{ d\psi(t)}{dt}(t) = \sum_{n} \left[ i \frac{ d c_n}{dt}(t) \psi_{n,t} + c_n(t) i \frac{ d \psi_{n,t} }{dt} \right] \ .$

You may know project to $\psi_{m,t}$, but the equation you get is

$ i \frac{ d c_m}{dt}(t) = E_{m,t} c_m(t) - \sum_{n} c_n(t) \left\langle \psi_{m, t}, i \frac{ d \psi_{n,t} }{dt} \right \rangle \ ;$

And this is no longer easy to solve. You might be interested in the topic of adiabatic quantum mechanics, which is basically a pertubation theory neglecting off-diagonal elements of the matrix $ K_{mn}(t) = \left\langle \psi_{m, t}, i \frac{ d \psi_{n,t} }{dt} \right \rangle$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Okay this makes sense. So Sakurai has expanded the state $|\psi(t)\rangle$ in terms of simultaneous eigenstates as $| \psi(t) \rangle = \sum_n c_n(t) |\psi_{n,t} \rangle$. Does the $t$ in $|\psi(t)\rangle$ evolve by Schrodinger's equation still? If so, I find that $c(t) = c(0)\exp(-i \int_0^t E_{n,t} dt )$. I am confused between the usage of the parameter $t$, i.e. where to treat it as a simultaneous, non-evolving time, or where to treat it as an evolving time. $\endgroup$ – Matt0410 Oct 11 '18 at 12:54

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.