I've just learned the evolution of some quantum system for about a week, and our homework sometimes something like this. I don't quite have any idea of solving this kind of problem.

Can you help giving me some fundamental enlightment on these problems, say one like this:

" Assume the spin number of a particle is 1, if the measure of the x component of spin is +1 at first, then the y component is measured -1. What is the probability that the x component is measured to be +1 again? "

Thank you very much!

  • $\begingroup$ en.wikipedia.org/wiki/… $\endgroup$ – John Rennie Nov 3 '12 at 16:08
  • $\begingroup$ @JohnRennie do you mean that the probability is $1/3$? $\endgroup$ – Golbez Nov 3 '12 at 16:18
  • $\begingroup$ @Golbez: I can't answer that without giving Li the answer to his homework :-) $\endgroup$ – John Rennie Nov 3 '12 at 16:25

You need to know how to rotate wavefunctions from one z axis to another z axis, that's it. I'll do it for spin 1/2, and you can work out the same for spin 1.

For spin 1/2, the operator which generates rotations around the x-axis is:

$$ S_x = {1\over 2} \sigma_x$$

Notice that $\sigma_x^2=1$, so that using the Taylor series of the exponential:

$$ e^{i\theta S_x} = \cos({\theta\over 2}) I + i \sin({\theta\over 2}) \sigma_x $$

If you rotate by a $\theta$ of 90 degrees, the resulting matrix is

$$ {1\over\sqrt{2}} ( I + i \sigma x ) $$

Applying this to the state (1,0), you get the state $(1, i)$, up to a normalizing factor of $\sqrt{2}$. This is the state of +1 spin in the y direction, and you can check that it is an eigenvector of $\sigma_y$.

So if you prepare the state $(1,i)$, the amplitude to be in the + or - z spin state is 1,i. The square of this is the probability you want.

To repeat this for spin 1, or any spin, you can use tensors of spin-1/2, or D matrices in elementary quantum mecanics books.

This is not a transmission of anything, it's just asking what the probability of state A to be found as state B in quantum mechanics without any time evolution, just using idealized measurements. This problem is also discussed very well from a physical point of view for spin 1/2 in Feynman's lectures III.

| cite | improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.