1
$\begingroup$

I am trying to compute the cross-section for the diagram below with a divergent triangle loop: $\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad$enter image description here

where $X^0$ and $X^-$ are some fermions with zero and negative charge respectively. I am interested in low energy limits, so you can consider W-propagator as $\frac{i\eta_{\mu\nu}}{M_w^2}$.

When computing the amplitude, ignoring the external wave functions, you end of with an integration of the form: $$ \int \frac {k_\mu \gamma^\mu +m_-} {k^2 -m_-^2 +i\epsilon} \frac {d^4 k} {(2\pi)^4} $$ where $m_-$ is mass of $X^-$.

Any ideas how to solve this integral in terms of kinematic parameters, masses etc?

$\endgroup$
3
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Well, you notice yourself that the expression diverges. And I am not sure I understand how you get rid of the dependence of the W propagators on the loop momentum. The integrals are standard, look up Passarino-Veltman functions. $\endgroup$
    – user178876
    Commented Oct 3, 2018 at 3:23
  • $\begingroup$ @marmot, for simplicity, I just assumed that the loop momentum is less than W boson mass. Maybe, I oversimplified the integral as that is an internal momentum. $\endgroup$
    – Ramtin
    Commented Oct 3, 2018 at 6:36
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ You cannot make this assumption since the loop momentum gets integrated all the way up to infinity, as your formula shows. $\endgroup$
    – user178876
    Commented Oct 3, 2018 at 14:08

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

Agree with marnot that you can't get rid of W propagators in the loop.

That being said, the integral per se $$ \int \frac {k_\mu \gamma^\mu +m_-} {k^2 -m_-^2 +i\epsilon} \frac {d^4 k} {(2\pi)^4} $$ is a typical single fermion loop (e.g. a vacuum bubble diagram), where the first term related to $$ k_\mu \gamma^\mu $$ drops out since it's odd in $k_\mu$.

The second term related to $$ m_- $$ is quadratic divergent, which amounts to zero however in dimensional regularization (one of the peculiarities of DR).

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Why do you say the second term is zero? $\endgroup$
    – CAF
    Commented Oct 5, 2018 at 20:42
  • $\begingroup$ It's one of the quirks of DR. $\endgroup$
    – MadMax
    Commented Oct 5, 2018 at 20:45
  • $\begingroup$ It’s well understood and only vanishing for certain $d$ and if there’s no scale. Here there is a scale $m$_ present so you’re not dealing with a scaleless integral. $\endgroup$
    – CAF
    Commented Oct 5, 2018 at 20:50

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.