4
$\begingroup$

In Arnold's Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics, he derives the Hamilton-Jacobi equation (HJE) using a generating function $S_1(Q, q)$ to get

$$ H\left(\frac{\partial S_1(Q, q)}{\partial q}, q, t \right) ~=~ K(Q, t). $$

However, this is different from what I've seen in other physics texts. For example, Goldstein uses the generating function $S_2(q, P, t)$ to get the equation

$$ H\left(\frac{\partial S_2(q, P, t)}{\partial q}, q, t\right) ~=~ - \frac{\partial S_2(q, P, t)}{\partial t}. $$

Why is there this difference? Are the two equations saying the same thing?

$\endgroup$
6
$\begingroup$

The main points are:

  1. We are studying a Canonical Transformation (CT) $$(q,p) \longrightarrow (Q,P) $$ from old canonical coordinates $(q,p)$ and Hamiltonian $H(q,p,t)$ to new canonical coordinates $(Q,P)$and Kamiltonian $K(Q,P,t)$.

  2. $S_1(q,Q,t)$ is a so-called type 1 generating function of the CT.

  3. $S_2(q,P,t)$ is a so-called type 2 generating function of the CT.

  4. The two types of generating function are connected via a Legendre transformation $$S_2(q,P,t)-S_1(q,Q,t)~=~Q^i P_i. $$

  5. For all four types of generating functions hold that $$K-H~=~\frac{\partial S_i}{\partial t},\qquad i~=~1,2,3,4. $$

  6. Goldstein, Classical Mechanics, uses $S_2(q,P,t)$ in the treatment of Hamilton-Jacobi equation. Goldstein assumes that the Kamiltonian $K=0$ vanishes identically.

  7. Arnold, Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics, uses $S_1(q,Q,t)$ in Section 47 and $S_2(q,P,t)$ in Section 48. Arnold assumes (among other things) that $S_1(q,Q,t)$ does not depend explicitly on $t$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ For the record: J.V. Jose & E.J. Saletan, Classical dynamics: a contemporary approach, also uses a type 1 generating function. $\endgroup$ – Qmechanic Jan 2 '17 at 15:39

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.