3
$\begingroup$

A version of the Noether's theorem applies to local gauge symmetries. What is the Noether's charge associated with a non-abelian gauge symmetry such as the color $SU(3)$ and how is that derived? I want an expression for the color charge operator like we have an expression for the electric charge operator. Please see Eq. (9) and (11) of the answer here.

$\endgroup$
4
$\begingroup$

The $\mathrm{SU}(3)$ gauge symmetry is a local symmetry, and therefore it is not Noether's first, but Noether's second theorem that applies to it, which does not yield conserved quantities.

For $\mathrm{U}(1)$ gauge symmetries like the electromagnetic symmetry, there is also a global $\mathrm{U}(1)$ symmetry, and hence a conserved quantity. But the global symmetry associated to a non-Abelian gauge symmetry is just the center of the gauge group, which is discrete for $\mathrm{SU}(3)$, and hence there is no conserved quantity associated to it. This center symmetry has physical significance e.g. in models of confinement, see this question and its answer.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Could you please elaborate on the global symmetry associated to a gauge symmetry? (e.g. what it is, how to find it, does it always exist..) $\endgroup$ – Stephan Oct 19 '18 at 3:11
  • $\begingroup$ Or why it‘s the center of SU(3) and not just a global SU(3)? $\endgroup$ – Stephan Oct 20 '18 at 3:45
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Stephan Note that a non-Abelian gauge transformation acts as $A\mapsto gAg^{-1} + \mathrm{d}g$, so constant transformations that are not in the center still change the gauge field, and are therefore still gauge transformations between physically identical states. In this answer, by "global symmetry" I mean a symmetry that does not change the gauge field and therefore transforms between physically distinct states, since these are the symmetries to which one can meaningfully apply Noether's theorem. $\endgroup$ – ACuriousMind Oct 20 '18 at 10:58
  • $\begingroup$ That makes sense, thank you! So for the case of U(1), the center of the group coincides with the group itself, so that's why we have the additional U(1)? $\endgroup$ – Stephan Oct 20 '18 at 12:36

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.