do you know whether there are some modification of Davisson–Germer double slit experiment when we replace one screen with double slit with two consecutive screens with double slits separated by some distance $d$. At the first screen we could apply some sort of detector to one or another slit, at the second we have no detectors. What will be the behaviour of output interference pattern? Intuition could suggest 2 answers:

  1. If $d < L\propto \lambda$ where $\lambda$ is the De Brooglie wavelength, we will see no interference pattern, if $d > L$ we will see interference pattern as no first screen presented.
  2. No matter whatever $d$ is we will see no interference pattern, because wavefunction is collapsed.

But what are real behaviour of particles in these experiments?

  • $\begingroup$ The setup is a little unclear, and I might suggest that (mis)applying intuition to quantum mechanics has doomed many a student... $\endgroup$ – Jon Custer Sep 24 '18 at 15:09

If you detect the particle you destroy or collapse it, so it really can't travel on. For electrons you can alter the path but its not a detection, for photons you can use polarizers which is a form of detection but everything gets entangled. If you put many successive slits, diffraction will occur each time although many particles will never make it through.

| cite | improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.