Consider $N$ atoms, each with magnetic moment $\mu$ in a zero field $H = 0$. Given the assumption that each moment is equally likely, what is the magnetization in the thermodynamic limit?

The idea of magnetization is fairly new to me; but, from reading online, I think that it is analogous to density. Furthermore, I know that the thermodynamic limit is when $N \rightarrow \infty$ and $V\rightarrow \infty$ with $N/V$ held constant.

I know that magnetization is defined as $dm/dV$, where $m$ is the elementary magnetic moment, and $V$ is the volume. When $V \rightarrow \infty$, the denominator of the $dm/dV$ term approaches $0$; so, is my answer just $0$?


First of all, since the dipole distribution is uniform you can rewrite magnetization as $m/V$, where by $m$ I mean the total magnetization of $N$ atoms. Without losing any generality, let us assume that magnetic field $\vec H$ is applied along $z$ axis. Then, the part of the Hamiltonian that depends on magnetic field (energy of the dipole in field is a scalar product of the field and the dipole): \begin{equation} \mathcal{H_m}= -\mu H_z\sum\limits_{i=1}^N \cos{\theta_i}. \end{equation} Total magnetization is (see eq. (6.1.12) of Schwabl "Statistical mechanics" or eq. (52.1) Landau, Lifshitz "Statistical physics. Part 1. Vol 5." for discussion of Hamiltonian and magnetization). \begin{equation} m=-\langle{\partial \mathcal{H_m}}/{\partial H_z}\rangle=\mu \sum\limits_{i=1}^N \frac N\pi \frac \pi N \cos{\theta_i}=\frac{\mu N}\pi\int\limits_0^\pi d\theta \, \cos{\theta}=\frac{\mu N}\pi, \end{equation} where I've used $N>>1$ to justify rewriting the sum to integral in the second to last equality ($\pi/N$ becomes $d\theta$). Then desired magnetization is $\frac\mu \pi \frac N V$.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Thanks so much. Where did you get the equations for $U$ and $m$? I've searched the Wikipedia pages and online, but I cannot find them. Also, I was wondering if you could verify if my probability distribution function is correct? $\endgroup$ – georoberto55 Sep 16 '18 at 23:28
  • $\begingroup$ Added references, but not sure about your probability distribution. $\endgroup$ – physavage Sep 17 '18 at 1:20
  • $\begingroup$ Ok thanks. How about the equation for $U$ ? $\endgroup$ – georoberto55 Sep 17 '18 at 1:27
  • $\begingroup$ I've changed the notation from $U$ to $\mathcal{H_m}$ so it is more consistent with the aforementioned references. And added physical motivation of that contribution to energy (it is true for the electric field and electric dipole). $\endgroup$ – physavage Sep 17 '18 at 2:05

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.