This question is taken from the book "Classical Dynamics of Particles and Systems" - Marion, problem 7.24. The problem is about a pendulum that is set into motion, it's length varies at a constant rate $$\frac{dl}{dt} = - \alpha.$$ The reader is asked to compute the Lagrangian, the Hamiltonian and discuss conservation of energy. Computing the Lagrangian we get: $$ L = T - U = \frac{1}{2}m(\dot{l}^2 + l^2\dot{\theta}^2) + mgl\cos{\theta} = \frac{1}{2}m(\alpha^2 + l^2\dot{\theta}^2) + mgl\cos{\theta}. $$ Now, we can find the generalized momenta both for $\theta$ and $l$: $$p_{\theta} = \frac{\partial L}{ \partial \dot{\theta}} = ml^2\dot{\theta}$$ $$p_{l} = \frac{\partial L}{ \partial \dot{l}} = m\dot{l} = -m\alpha.$$ Now that we have the generalized momenta we can write the Hamiltonian following: $$H = \sum_i p_i\dot{q_i} - L = \frac{p_{\theta}^2}{2m l^2} + \frac{p_{l}^2}{2m}- mgl\cos{\theta}.$$ But, according to the book, the Hamiltonian is actually equal to: $$H = \sum_i p_i\dot{q_i} - L = \frac{p_{\theta}^2}{2m l^2} - \frac{p_{l}^2}{2m}- mgl\cos{\theta}.$$ This result basically ignores the term $p_l\dot{l}$. Why?

  • $\begingroup$ I don’t think that l is a generalized coordinate, so pl is not correct $\endgroup$ – Eli Sep 16 '18 at 21:18
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Why wouldn't it be? Considering that we need to know l to specify the position of the pendulum mass. $\endgroup$ – prm Sep 16 '18 at 22:24


  1. The original Lagrangian system has 2 variables $(\ell,\theta)$ and 1 constraint $\ell=\ell_0-\alpha t$.

  2. By inserting the constraint we can rewrite this as a reduced Lagrangian system with 1 variable $\theta$ and 0 constraints.

  3. The corresponding reduced Hamiltonian system then has variables $(\theta,p_{\theta})$ with Hamiltonian $H=p_{\theta}\dot{\theta}-L$.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.