I am making the attempt to develop some computational models of Star systems and I was wondering how the a torus shaped planet would compare to a traditional spherical planet in the context of rotational and orbital motion.

closed as off-topic by StephenG, ZeroTheHero, garyp, Ben Crowell, John Rennie Sep 16 at 9:04

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "We deal with mainstream physics here. Questions about the general correctness of unpublished personal theories are off topic, although specific questions evaluating new theories in the context of established science are usually allowed. For more information, see Is non mainstream physics appropriate for this site?." – StephenG, ZeroTheHero, garyp, Ben Crowell, John Rennie
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • Can you clarify a bit? What do you mean by 'negative force'? In what direction? – Al Nejati Sep 16 at 0:03
  • This reminds me of this video youtu.be/UrLey-pX7Bc – Aaron Stevens Sep 16 at 0:56
  • The center of a torus-planet is a gravitational saddle point: masses will be attracted towards the plane of the torus, while pulled towards the torus. So it is not exactly negative. There are some papers on orbits in this geometry, will see if I can find them. – Anders Sandberg Sep 16 at 1:18
  • 1
    see io9.gizmodo.com/… – anna v Sep 16 at 3:45
  • 1
    I really wonder why this is not regarded as mainstream physics, since point masses moving in classical fields is about as mainstream as anything can be. And there is a biggish literature in astrophysics on orbits related to massive torii in AGNs, so torus shaped mass distributions are also mainstream. – Anders Sandberg Sep 16 at 20:15
up vote 2 down vote accepted

To make a ring-shaped planet it needs to rotate very fast to counteract the gravitation trying to crush it into a sphere. There is a fairly big literature on such rings, with Dyson's papers(1893) as the locus classicus. See the introduction of this paper for more references. I did some (admittedly crude) simulations of a torus planet myself back in 2014.

The main issues affecting the question is (1) The effective surface gravity varies along the surface (the surface remains at the same potential): it is higher along the "poles" and lowest along the "equators" on the inside and outside. (2) The torus is fairly elliptical. (3) there is a high rotation rare, and this will produce Coriolis acceleration.

Near the surface and for short distances projectile motion will look fairly terrestrial. Thrown things follow parabolas. As the trajectories get longer the above effects will matter. The Coriolis acceleration $\mathbf{a}=2\mathbf{v}\times\mathbf{\Omega}$ will tend to tilt and twist the trajectory. Along the poles $\mathbf{\Omega}$ and gravity as aligned, and the trajectory will be tilted and twisted. Closer to the equators the twisting gets more asymmetric. Coriolis-affected trajectories near poleCoriolis-affected trajectories near equator

For even longer trajectories the other factors will further twist the trajectory, plus the ground is no longer flat. There will be different gravitational acceleration in different points, and so on. In this range the trajectories are fairly hard to describe.

For higher trajectories we get counterparts to satellite orbits. Obviously there are equatorial orbits. The flattened mass distribution induces precession of elliptic orbits. This gets more extreme for tilted orbits. There are also orbits through the hole, and orbits that bob back and forth through the hole in chaotic ways. See the plots in this post or below.

Torus orbits

The key thing to note is that gravity is always attractive but a ring produces a field that attracts towards the ring so the centre point is an unstable fixed point: mass is attracted towards the equatorial plane, but pulled outward towards the ring.

  • I'm glad you were able to post this before the question was put on hold... and your torusearth page is great. – PM 2Ring Sep 17 at 11:56
  • @PM2Ring - Thanks! I also have some more detail on the ball trajectories on my blog about this, aleph.se/andart2/physics/throwing-balls-on-torus-earth - it turns out one can view the trajectory as an electron in a combined electric and magnetic field, and decompose it into a helix plus a drift velocity. Granted, the effect is small for reasonable trajectories. – Anders Sandberg Sep 17 at 20:08

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.