1
$\begingroup$

Is the electric field produced by uniformly moving charges non-conservative? And if it is, then why?

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

For a field to be conservative, you need $\nabla \times \mathbf{E} = 0$. See in my answer here how this relates to converservation of energy and path indepenedence.

The third Maxwell equation (Faraday's law + Lenz's law) states:

$$ \nabla \times \mathbf{E} = -\frac{\partial\mathbf{B}}{\partial t} \neq 0. $$

This is your first inkling that, when you have moving charges and hence electrodyanmics (as opposed to electrostatics, where $\partial/\partial t = 0$) entails a non-conservative electric field.

If you don't want to use Maxwell's equation, you can also start from the general expression for the electric field $$ \mathbf{E} = -\nabla\phi - \frac{\partial\mathbf{A}}{\partial t},$$

and left multiply by $\nabla \times$, obtaining the same result.


Now, to be a bit more pedantic.
In order to have $\nabla\times\mathbf{E} = 0$ from the equation above, you require:

  • either $\partial/\partial t = 0$, i.e. electrostatics
  • or $\mathbf{B} = 0$
  • or both.

This is why, I am assuming, knzhou asked you about accelerating charges in the comment.
Because, what if you have a moving charge which is not generating a magnetic field? Then $\partial/\partial t \neq 0$ but $\mathbf{B} = 0$, which guarantees an overall $\nabla\times\mathbf{E} = 0.$

However, you already know that a charge moving at constant velocity is basically a current (if you consider a very small length element $\mathrm{d}\mathbf{r}$), which you know creates a magnetic field $\mathbf{B} \neq 0$.

Indeed, the full expression for the electric and magnetic fields is given here, and an example of the expression is given in the answer linked by Alfred Centauri.


Let me add a final remark.

What if you travelling in a frame of reference that moves at the same speed as a constant-velocity moving charge? Then you would see the charge as stationary, with both $\mathbf{B} = 0$ (ignoring spin) and $\partial/\partial t = 0$.
This is because magnetic field naturally come out of electrostatics + special relativity, i.e. they are electric fields seen in a different reference frame. (magnetic fields from magnets are still relativistic because they come from spin, which is a "relativistic" effect in the sense that it comes from the Dirac equation).

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.