I want to look at the projection of the velocity of a particle in the rotating frame onto an axis in the inertial frame as a function of time. For example, I am calculating

\begin{equation} \frac{d\boldsymbol{r}}{dt}=\frac{d\boldsymbol{r}'}{dt}+\boldsymbol{\Omega}\times\boldsymbol{r}' \end{equation}

Where $\boldsymbol{r}$ is the position vector of the particle, the un-primed is the inertial frame and the prime the rotating. $\Omega$ is the angular velocity of the rotating frame with respect to the inertial, and can also be a function of time. Then I would like to look at the $z$-axis component of $\frac{d\boldsymbol{r}}{dt}$ which is $\frac{dz}{dt}=\frac{d\boldsymbol{r}}{dt}\bullet\hat{\boldsymbol{k}}$. Then from above I have

\begin{equation} \frac{dz}{dt}=\left(\frac{d\boldsymbol{r}'}{dt}+\boldsymbol{\Omega}\times\boldsymbol{r}'\right)\bullet\hat{\boldsymbol{k}} \end{equation}

Which now means I need to look at the dot products of $\hat{\boldsymbol{i}}'\bullet\hat{\boldsymbol{k}}\quad, \hat{\boldsymbol{j}}'\bullet\hat{\boldsymbol{k}}\quad$ and $ \hat{\boldsymbol{k}}'\bullet\hat{\boldsymbol{k}}$. I am confused about how to proceed with doing this?


To define the orientation of the rotating frame you need a 3×3 orthonormal rotation matrix $\mathbf{R}$. This will give you the local to the inertial frame transformation of vectors using a matrix-vector product.

$$ \mathbf{c} = \mathbf{R}\, \mathbf{c}' $$

Now the columns of $\mathbf{R}$ are exactly the dot product you described, or the components of the local coordinates expressed in the inertial frame

$$ \mathbf{R} = \left[ \begin{array}{c|c|c} \boldsymbol{\hat{\imath}}' & \boldsymbol{\hat{\jmath}}' & \boldsymbol{\hat{k}}' \end{array} \right] = \left[ \begin{array}{c|c|c} \boldsymbol{\hat{\imath}}' \cdot \boldsymbol{\hat{\imath}} & \boldsymbol{\hat{\jmath}}' \cdot \boldsymbol{\hat{\imath}} & \boldsymbol{\hat{k}}'\cdot \boldsymbol{\hat{\imath}} \\ \boldsymbol{\hat{\imath}}' \cdot \boldsymbol{\hat{\jmath}} & \boldsymbol{\hat{\jmath}}' \cdot \boldsymbol{\hat{\jmath}} & \boldsymbol{\hat{k}}'\cdot \boldsymbol{\hat{\jmath}} \\ \boldsymbol{\hat{\imath}}' \cdot \boldsymbol{\hat{k}} & \boldsymbol{\hat{\jmath}}' \cdot \boldsymbol{\hat{k}} & \boldsymbol{\hat{k}}'\cdot \boldsymbol{\hat{k}} \end{array} \right] = \left[ \matrix{ \hat{\imath}_x' & \hat{\jmath}_x' & \hat{k}_x' \\ \hat{\imath}_y' & \hat{\jmath}_y' & \hat{k}_y' \\ \hat{\imath}_z' & \hat{\jmath}_z' & \hat{k}_z' } \right] $$

Now specifically, the kinematics of a rotating frame are derived from the transformation of coordinates:

$$ \mathbf{r} = \mathbf{r}_0 + \mathbf{R}\, \mathbf{r}' $$

Here $\mathbf{r}_0$ is the origin of the rotating frame in inertial coordinates, $\mathbf{R}$ the 3×3 orientation matrix, $\mathbf{r}'$ the position vector in the rotating frame, and $\mathbf{r}$ the position vector in the inertial frame.

Take the derivative of the above to get

$$ \mathbf{v} = \mathbf{v}_0 + \boldsymbol{\Omega} \times \mathbf{R}\, \mathbf{r}' + \mathbf{R}\, \frac{\partial \mathbf{r}'}{\partial t} $$

This hinges on the property that the rotation matrix represents 3 unit length vectors and hence $\dot{\mathbf{R}} = \boldsymbol{\Omega} \times \mathbf{R}$.

| cite | improve this answer | |
  • $\begingroup$ I'm still a bit confused. Is your primed the local or inertial frame? I'm also still unsure how to use this information to obtain the velocity of $\dot{z}$(the z-component of velocity in the inertial frame). Do I need to calculate the components of $\boldsymbol{R}$? $\endgroup$ – jamie1989 Sep 5 '18 at 14:32
  • $\begingroup$ The z-direction of velocity is the 3rd component of $\mathbf{v}$. Yes, you need to define $\mathbf{R}$ based on axis-angle, euler-angles or quaternions. The primed unit vectors $\mathbf{\hat{\imath}}'$ etc contain the components of the rotating coordinate system expressed in the inertial system. $\endgroup$ – John Alexiou Sep 5 '18 at 17:00
  • $\begingroup$ Ah, so i've been calculating the velocity in the inertial frame by just plugging in $\boldsymbol{r}'$ without the $\boldsymbol{R}$ in yours, which I can now see is wrong? What would you say is the easiest way to go about obtaining $\boldsymbol{R}$ axis-angle, euler-angles or quaternions? I'd like to keep $\boldsymbol{\Omega}$ time dependent in general does this change $\boldsymbol{v}$ at all? $\endgroup$ – jamie1989 Sep 5 '18 at 17:43
  • $\begingroup$ If $\mathbf{\Omega}(t)$ is a function of time, then $\mathbf{v}$ isn't affected, but $\dot{\mathbf{v}}$ is. If you have a single fixed rotation axis, then use the axis angle method. If you have a free body, then euler-angles is a good start. It is best to work with a common inertial reference frame early on in order to avoid confusions. That is why I am starting with inertial position $\mathbf{r}$ first and deriving everything from there using time derivatives. $\endgroup$ – John Alexiou Sep 5 '18 at 17:48
  • $\begingroup$ The rotation axis $\hat{\boldsymbol{n}}$ where $\boldsymbol{\Omega}=\Omega\hat{\boldsymbol{n}}$ is not fixed, it is a function of time so I'm looking at Euler angles. It doesn't seem easy to obtain these angles from a time dependent rotation axis, am I over complicating this problem or is it just not that trivial? $\endgroup$ – jamie1989 Sep 5 '18 at 19:12

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.