0
$\begingroup$

Suppose there is a rectangular solid, with dimensions $l_x$, $l_y$ and $l_z$, and imagine that an electron inside experiences no force at all, except at the impenetrable walls:

$$V(x,y,z)= \begin{array}{cc} \{ & \begin{array}{cc} 0, & 0<x<l_x, 0<y<l_y, 0<z<l_z \\ \infty, & otherwise \\ \end{array} \end{array} $$

The (normalized) wave functions are

$$\psi_{n_xn_yn_z}=\sqrt{\frac{8}{l_xl_yl_z}}sin(\frac{n_x\pi}{l_x}x)sin(\frac{n_y\pi}{l_y}y)sin(\frac{n_z\pi}{l_z}z),$$

and the allowed energies are

$$E_{n_xn_yn_z}=\frac{\hbar^2\pi^2}{2m}(\frac{n_x^2}{l_x^2}+\frac{n_y^2}{l_y^2}+\frac{n_z^2}{l_z^2})=\frac{\hbar^2k^2}{2m},$$

where $k$ is the magnitude of the $\textbf{wave vector, k}\equiv(k_x,k_y,k_z)$.

My questions are:

  1. The wave function(considering the part of time also) is not a travelling wave in case of infinite potential well so what's the significance of wave vector in this case? Its real and imaginary parts are standing waves but as a whole can I say that it's a standing wave?

  2. If I solve $E=\frac{\hbar^2k^2}{2m}$ using $m=\frac{E}{c^2}$, $E=h\nu$ and $\frac{c}{\nu}=\lambda$, I get $k=\frac{2\sqrt{2}\pi}{\lambda}$ while in fact k should be equal to $\frac{2\pi}{\lambda}$. Where am I mistaken?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Equation really is $E^2=m^2c^4+p^2c^2$. But I don't understand what do you want to achieve. $\endgroup$ – Jitendra Aug 26 '18 at 7:38
  • $\begingroup$ Considering ques 1. As far as I know, wave vector is in the direction of wave propagation in a lossless isotropic medium and is defined for only travelling waves. That's why I want to ask whether the given wave function is a travelling wave because k is called the wave vector. $\endgroup$ – Asit Srivastava Aug 26 '18 at 7:57
  • $\begingroup$ It's a standing wave, which is formed by two exactly same travelling waves but propagating in opposite directions. $\endgroup$ – Jitendra Aug 26 '18 at 9:17
  • $\begingroup$ How can it be proved from $E=\frac{\hbar^2k^2}{2m}$ that $k=\frac{2\pi}{\lambda}$? $\endgroup$ – Asit Srivastava Aug 26 '18 at 10:11
  • $\begingroup$ You do not need $E=\frac{\hbar^2k^2}{2m}$ to prove $k=\frac{2\pi}{\lambda}$. Time period of an oscillation is defined as $T=\frac{\lambda}{c}$ iff velocity is $c$, otherwise following on @okruz's answer as velocity here really is $\frac{2\pi\nu}{k}$, $T=\frac{\lambda k}{2\pi\nu}$, which gives $k=\frac{2\pi}{\lambda}$ on using $T=\frac{1}{\nu}$. $\endgroup$ – Jitendra Aug 26 '18 at 11:02
1
$\begingroup$

The formula $E=mc^2$ is a relativistic one and does not really make sense in the context of your solution to the "particle in a box" problem which assumes a constant mass.

Secondly (given that $c$ refers to the velocity of light in vacuum), the formula $\frac{c}{\nu}=\lambda$ assumes that the phase velocity of the wave is $c$, which is not the case. The phase velocity is $c_{p}=\frac{\omega}{k} = \frac{E}{\hbar k} = \frac{\hbar k}{2m}$ (with $\omega = 2\pi\nu$).

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.