1
$\begingroup$

Why in presence of electromagnetic field hamiltonian,describing 2 systems with tunneling(for example josephson junction ) $$H=H_L+H_R+T(I+I^{\dagger})$$ where $I=c_Lc^{\dagger}_R$ is tunneling operator

should be changed as follows $$H=H_L+H_R+T(I e^{-i a}+I^{\dagger}e^{ia})$$ where $$a=\int_{L}^{R}\vec{A} d\vec{x}$$ $\vec{A}$-vector potential. For example when we put voltage $V$ to our system,$\vec{A}=-\vec{E}t$ and $a(t)=V t$.

$\endgroup$

closed as unclear what you're asking by peterh, user191954, Jon Custer, Kyle Kanos, AccidentalFourierTransform Sep 20 '18 at 13:49

Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Could you please provide some more context for your notation? What is I, what is A? $\endgroup$ – SabrinaChoice Aug 28 '18 at 16:13
  • $\begingroup$ Also, it looks like this just accounts for probability of tunneling decreasing exponentially with distance. See Griffiths sec 2.6 and 2.7 (finite square well and scattering). $\endgroup$ – SabrinaChoice Aug 28 '18 at 16:14
  • $\begingroup$ you can see,that this coefficients became time dependent,unlike in griffiths. Now i think this coefficients should be modified to ensure gauge invariance,but why in this way? $\endgroup$ – Alexander Nikolaenko Aug 29 '18 at 17:15