1
$\begingroup$

When for example, a photon is emitted from an atom, does that photon propagate through spacetime in all directions away from the atom in the form of a sphere (Wave Function) and then at some point along its propagation it is absorbed, reflected or refracted (detected) and at that point do we then consider it a Point Particle?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, the photon leaves the emitter as a wave, not necessarily a sphere, but as what is described by its specific wave function. Eventually the photon is detected as a particle. Between these two events, it is possible that the wave is reflected or refracted without detection. See this for details: physics.stackexchange.com/questions/368333/… $\endgroup$ – safesphere Aug 21 '18 at 8:45
  • $\begingroup$ So then with regards to reflection and refraction of a wave function, are they consequnces which are analogous to certain energies that are required to make an electron jump states. Are reflections and refractions interactions that like energies that are not exact enough, will not produce a detection? $\endgroup$ – Mike R. Aug 21 '18 at 11:06
  • $\begingroup$ Reflection and refraction are not events where electrons absorb/release photons. @safesphere was saying (I am pretty sure) that between your events of emission and detection of the photon, the photon could also undergo reflection or refraction without counting as "detection" as you have stated in your question. $\endgroup$ – Aaron Stevens Aug 21 '18 at 11:36
  • $\begingroup$ @AaronStevens "Elastic scattering " is just a label. The actual QFT process is described by the operator of annihilation of the initial photon pushing the electron off shell (making it virtual to mediate the process). Then the operator of creation of a new photon puts the electron back on shell. Massless particles are not little balls that can bounce. They must follow the hull geodesic between the emission and absorption. The correct explanation of why this is not "detection" is that the photon interacts not with one electron, but with a superposition of many. See the link in my comment above. $\endgroup$ – safesphere Aug 21 '18 at 17:27
  • $\begingroup$ @MikeR. An atom can absorb a photon due to the electron changing levels. However a free electron cannot absorb a photon, because both energy and momentum cannot be conserved by a massive particle absorbing a massless particle. When an electron absorbs a photon, energy is not conserved. This is allowed for a very short time by the uncertainty principle and makes the electron virtual (off mass shell). Then the electron emits a new photon that also violates energy conservation, but in the exactly opposite way thus restoring the energy balance and making the electron real (on mass shell) again. $\endgroup$ – safesphere Aug 21 '18 at 19:18
0
$\begingroup$

A photon is effectively a wave until it is detected. The classical two-slit interferometer, used with light so dim that only one photon is present in the apparatus at a time, shows that each photon's wave function passes through both slits - which is inconsistent with the photon being a point particle during its propagation. However, the wave function only has spherical symmetry if it is emitted from an infinitesimal point. In the case of the two-slit interferometer, the part of the wave downstream from each slit has approximately the form of a cylindrical wave.

$\endgroup$
-1
$\begingroup$

A single photon gets emitted in a specific direction. Example, a pebble dropped in a pond but the pebble was dropped in the middle of 3 logs in a "U" shape, thus the wave is directed and this is a good analogy for the photon. But the wave is still spreading out and can be affected by many other objects in the pond. Why the photon/atom behaves this way is likely because of the interaction with the other electrons or nucleus of the atom when the photon is emitted.

A photon can interact with objects it passes close too, this is diffraction, it changes the direction but the photon wave function is the same.

A photon can be refracted or reflected, the wave function is destroyed but immediately replaced by a new one as the electrons do the work.

You can consider the photon a point particle in many experiments/explanations, ex why is one light brighter than the other, i.e more particles. The use of the particle explanation is widely used. You can consider the photon a wave when your are studying its propagation, diffraction patterns etc.

Like water you would typically use the particle explanation when its raining or the wave explanation to explain for example a tsunami.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.