So I thought that

$$\hat{p}~=~-i\hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial x}~$$


$$\hat{x}~=~i\hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial p}~$$

but I have just encountered the next problem:

"Find the wave function for the fundamental state of

$$H = \frac{p^2}{2m}+\frac{1}{2}m\omega^2x^2$$

in the position base."

So they are asking me for: $\psi_0(x)= ⟨x|0⟩ $

I did as follows: I wanted to apply the condition:

$$a|0⟩ = 0$$

With "a" being:


I figured that since



$$\hat{p}|x⟩=-i\hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial x}|x⟩$$

I could just plug them in the equation for a and ended up with:

$$ \sqrt{\frac{m\omega}{2\hbar}} \bigg( x+\hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial x} \bigg) \psi_0 = 0$$

Which led me to:


But checking the answers, they stated that:

$$\hat{p}|x⟩=\frac{-i\hbar}{\sqrt{m\omega\hbar}} \frac{\partial}{\partial x}|x⟩$$

And I don't understand where does the square root diving $-i\hbar$ is coming from.

Thank you.

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ What is the meaning of $⟨x|\hat{x}⟩=x$? $\endgroup$ – Hector Aug 20 '18 at 21:10
  • $\begingroup$ @Hector They mean that the position operator in the position basis is just x. $\hat x \psi=x\psi$ $\endgroup$ – Aaron Stevens Aug 20 '18 at 21:13
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @AaronStevens No, "position operator in the position basis is just x" is written like this: $\hat x |x ⟩ = x | x ⟩$. $\endgroup$ – Hector Aug 20 '18 at 21:15
  • $\begingroup$ @Hector I was just telling you what I thought the OP meant. $\endgroup$ – Aaron Stevens Aug 20 '18 at 21:18
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Agree with @Hector here: notation is absolutely in need of clarification. $\endgroup$ – ZeroTheHero Aug 20 '18 at 21:53

I think this is a problem between different notations. First of all, indeed you have $ \widehat{x} \left | \Psi \right > = x\left | \Psi \right > $ and $ \widehat{p} \left | \Psi \right > = -i\hbar\frac{\partial\left | \Psi \right >}{\partial x} $. But the annihilation operator $\widehat{a}$ is equal to $\frac{\widehat{X}+i\widehat{P}}{\sqrt{2}}$ where $ \widehat{X}$ and $\widehat{P}$ are dimensionless operators.

And it happens that you have : $\widehat{X}=\sqrt{\frac{m\omega}{\hbar}}\widehat{x}$ and $\widehat{P} = \frac{\widehat{p}}{\sqrt{m\hbar \omega}}$ Hence the expression written in the answer where the $\widehat{p}$ should be interpreted as $\widehat{P}$ I guess.

And by the way if you use these expressions you will find that $\widehat{a}=\sqrt{\frac{m\omega}{2\hbar}}\left (\widehat{x}+\frac{i\widehat{p}}{m\omega} \right )$


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.