For the Bose-Hubbard model: $$H=-t\sum_{\langle i,j \rangle}(b_i^{\dagger}b_j+b_j^{\dagger}b_i)+K\sum_{i}(\hat{n}-n_0)^2$$ In the large-filling limit, we can replace $\hat{n}$ by $\hat{n}+n_0$, and also $\hat{n}_j$ by $-i\frac{\partial}{\partial \theta_j}$, after the which the on-site repulsion term in the Hamiltonian becomes the kinetic term for the phase angle.

However, for the hopping term, why can we simply replace $b_j^{\dagger}$ with $e^{i\theta_j}$? Basically, we are supposed to get the final phase-only quantum rotor model given as the following: $$H=-2t\sum_{\langle i,j \rangle}cos(\theta_i-\theta_j)+K\sum_j\left(-i\frac{\partial}{\partial \theta_j}\right)^2$$

Source: Eq.(14.3) from "advanced solid state physics 2e" by P. Philips.


You can simply replace $b^{\dagger}_{j}$ with $e^{i\theta_{j}}$ because the Hamiltonian (real) remains the same under this change. It can seen as follows (assuming $\theta_{i}$ and $\theta_{j}$ commute) --

$b^{\dagger}_{i}b_{j} + b^{\dagger}_{j}b_{i} = e^{i\theta_{i}}e^{-i\theta_{j}} + e^{i\theta_{j}}e^{-i\theta_{i}}$ = 2$\mathbb{R}~( e^{i(\theta_{i} - \theta_{j})})$ = 2 $\cos(\theta_{i} - \theta_{j})$

| cite | improve this answer | |
  • $\begingroup$ but how can be sure this $\theta\equiv -i\mathrm{log}b^{\dagger}$ is the same phase variable conjugate to particle number? $\endgroup$ – M. Zeng Aug 8 '18 at 21:43
  • $\begingroup$ I mean, even if it is restricted to $[0,2\pi)$, it still doesn't necessarily imply it's the same phase variable. $\endgroup$ – M. Zeng Aug 8 '18 at 22:00
  • $\begingroup$ also, another problem is it seems to assume the modulus of $b^{\dagger}$ is 1. $\endgroup$ – M. Zeng Aug 8 '18 at 22:03

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.