1
$\begingroup$

I'm slightly confused. Write the S-matrix as $$ S = 1 + i T $$ Unitarity implies $$ T - T^\dagger = i T^\dagger T $$ In scattering from $|i\rangle$ to $|f\rangle$, $$ T_{f,i} - T^\dagger_{f,i} = i \sum_n T^\dagger_{f,n} T_{n,i} $$ where the sum stands for both a summation over number of particles (say we only consider one type of scalar particle) and integration over their phase space, and (at least for $|a \rangle \neq |b \rangle$) $$ T_{a,b} = \langle a | T|b \rangle = (2\pi)^4 \delta^{(4)} (p_a -p_b) M_{a,b} $$ Therefore $$ M_{f,i} - M^*_{i,f} = i \sum_n (2\pi)^4 \delta^{(4)} (p_n -p_i) M^*_{n,f} M_{n,i} $$ In particular for forward scattering $$ 2 \operatorname{Im} M_{i,i} = \sum_n (2\pi)^4 \delta^{(4)} (p_n -p_i) |M_{n,i}|^2 $$ Consider the case of a single particle. What happens in the last sum over $n$ to the term with $n=1$? I'm confused as to how we do account for such $\delta(0) |M_{i,i}|^2$ term (if present) when we say that $\operatorname{Im} M_{i,i} =0$ if the particle is stable.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ When you talk about a single particle initial state $|i \rangle$, the sum over $n$ on the rhs then translates into the physically reliasable decay modes of $i$. If the particle is stable, $M_{n,i}=0$ for all n and if it’s unstable, the sum delimiter explores all phase space decay products and in particular $n$ is never $i$. $\endgroup$
    – CAF
    Commented Aug 13, 2018 at 16:53
  • $\begingroup$ @CAF Thanks, but I cannot see from first principles why the sum over $n$ must be restricted to $n \neq i$. Could you please explain? $\endgroup$
    – jj_p
    Commented Aug 13, 2018 at 17:27

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

When you talk about a single particle initial state $| i \rangle $, the sum over $n$ on the rhs then translates into the physically reliasable decay modes of $i$. If the particle is stable, $M_{n,i} = 0$ for all $n$ and if it’s unstable, the sum delimiter explores all phase space decay products and in particular $n$ is never $i$.

Recall the decay rate is given by $$\Gamma(i \rightarrow n) \sim \frac{1}{2 m_i} \int \text{d}\Pi_n (2 \pi)^4 \delta^4(p_i-p_n) |M_{n,i}|^2,$$ where $1/(2m_i)$ is the relativistic normalisation of states in the rest frame of the decaying particle with the branching fraction of a given decay species given by $B(i \rightarrow n) = \Gamma(i \rightarrow n)/\sum_n \Gamma(i \rightarrow n)$. In this sum we never include the case where $n=i$.

It may help intuitively to realise the evaluation $n=i$ within the $1$ of $S=1+iT$, i.e we have $|f \rangle = |i \rangle$ therein by definition with nothing happening in between. All contributions with $n≠i$ are encoded in the transition amplitude $T$, transition meaning something non trivial actually happens.

The forward 'scattering' optical theorem with a single particle initial state $| i \rangle$ can then be written as, using the above decay rate, $$\text{Im}\, M_{i, i} = m_i \sum_n \Gamma(i \rightarrow n)$$

$\endgroup$
9
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for your answer, but it's not clear to me whether the restriction $n \neq i$ follows from first principles (after all in my derivation above we just inserted a complete set of states in the form of 1), or are you saying $T_{ii}=0$? but then $M_{ii} \neq 0$? sorry for the confusion.. $\endgroup$
    – jj_p
    Commented Aug 14, 2018 at 13:52
  • $\begingroup$ Remember $n$ here is a kinematically permissible intermediate state between in and out. For a single particle initial state $i$ and you want to describe a forward ‘scattering’ $f=i$, these $n$ states are just corrections to the propagator. The contributions to the imaginary part of an amplitude are regions in phase space when intermediate states go on shell $\endgroup$
    – CAF
    Commented Aug 14, 2018 at 14:15
  • $\begingroup$ I agree that is the correct conclusion, but where does one see it in the derivation I provided above? in other words, are you saying that $T_{i,i}$ is zero? $\endgroup$
    – jj_p
    Commented Aug 14, 2018 at 16:56
  • $\begingroup$ The case $i=f$ with no intermediate states belongs in $1$. The case $i=f$ and with intermediate states (ie you want to describe a forward scattering, or in one particle case like yours, corrections to propagator) belongs in $T$. It is this $T$ used in deriving the optical theorem and by construction of the $ S= 1 + iT$ split, the $n$ states must be non trivial intermediates. $\endgroup$
    – CAF
    Commented Aug 14, 2018 at 17:09
  • $\begingroup$ Is it perhaps clearer now? The decomposition of S is just into trivial and non trivial events between i and f. $\endgroup$
    – CAF
    Commented Aug 14, 2018 at 17:10

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.