0
$\begingroup$

I came across a question which requires that we take the complex conjugate of $\psi_{1}+i\psi_{2}$ and the answer given was $(\psi_{1}-i\psi_{2})^{*}$. May I know why is it not $(\psi_{1}+i\psi_{2})^{*}$?

$\endgroup$
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ That sounds incorrect, can you show exactly where you saw that, with more context? $\endgroup$ – knzhou Jul 19 '18 at 18:32
  • $\begingroup$ I saw this on a problem set of the MIT course 8.04.1x, the question was to compute $\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} |\psi_{1}+i\psi_{2}|^{2}dx$ and the first step of the solution was $\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} |\psi_{1}+i\psi_{2}|^{2}dx$ = $\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} [\psi_{1}-i\psi_{2}]^{*}[\psi_{1}+i\psi_{2}]dx$. I'm not sure if there's an error in the solution. $\endgroup$ – Tianke Zhuang Jul 19 '18 at 18:40
  • $\begingroup$ It is an error. The answer can be written either as $(\psi_1 + i \psi_2)^*$ or as $(\psi^*_1 - i \psi^*_2)$. $\endgroup$ – my2cts Jul 19 '18 at 18:55
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, they made an error. I went to MIT and took this course. Unfortunately, the "EdX" problems are often put together by some overworked sleep-deprived undergrad that has just taken the course, paid about as much as a fast food worker. $\endgroup$ – knzhou Jul 19 '18 at 19:02
  • $\begingroup$ Basically, you shouldn't trust something to be right just because it has the MIT logo on it. If it looks ridiculous, it is! $\endgroup$ – knzhou Jul 19 '18 at 19:03
1
$\begingroup$

For context, the question has you find $\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} |\tilde \Psi(x,t)|^2 dx $, where $\tilde \Psi(x,t) = \Psi_1(x,t) + i\Psi_2(x,t)$ or $\tilde \Psi(x,t) = \Psi_1(x,t) + \Psi_2(x,t)$, to show the effects of the phase difference of an arbitrary two normalizable states.

The definition of the absolute value acting on complex numbers is, $$|\tilde \Psi(x,t)|^2=\tilde \Psi^*(x,t)\tilde \Psi(x,t)$$ And since the solution doesn't follow this, they were incorrect.

Their solution reflects this as their next steps assume that seemingly, \begin{align} (\Psi_1-i\Psi_2)^*(\Psi_1+i\Psi_2)&=|\Psi_1|^2+|\Psi_2|^2 +\Psi^*_1 (i\Psi_2)+\Psi_1(i\Psi_2)^*\\&=|\Psi_1|^2+|\Psi_2|^2 +i\Psi^*_1 \Psi_2-i\Psi_2\Psi_2^* \end{align} which is incorrect. Thus they had a sign issue in their first step but corrected it in later steps to get the right answer.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.