3
$\begingroup$

A basic question in rotation. Initially I have a Hamiltonian $$ H = \frac{-1}{2}(4E_c(1-n_g)\sigma_z + E_J\sigma_x) \, . $$ It's said that, if I rotate the coordinate system by mixing angle, $$ \theta = \arctan \left(\frac{E_J}{4E_c(1-n_g)} \right) $$ then in the new coordinate system, $\sigma_z$ becomes the quantization angle and the Hamiltonian would be $$ H'= \hbar \omega_a \sigma_z $$ where $\hbar \omega_a$ will be $$ \hbar \omega_a = \sqrt{E_J^2+(4E_c(1-n_g))^2} $$ Could you please tell how the Hamiltonian changes?

| cite | improve this question | | | | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Is this the Hamiltonian of a charge qubit or something? $\endgroup$ – DanielSank Jul 19 '18 at 17:49
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, that's right. $\endgroup$ – Akhil Pratap Singh Jul 19 '18 at 18:08
  • $\begingroup$ I have a feeling that it is not a full information. If you want to target a broader audience, give a reference, so that one could figure out such things as rotation group, axis etc. $\endgroup$ – MsTais Jul 19 '18 at 19:13
  • $\begingroup$ Intuitively if try to rotate around axis $\:y\:$ by $\:-\theta\:$ : $U=\cos\frac{\theta}{2}+i\sin\frac{\theta}{2}\sigma_{y}$ ??? $\endgroup$ – Frobenius Jul 19 '18 at 19:29
2
$\begingroup$

For convenience in order to simplify the equations let ignore the constant $\:-\frac12\:$ so that we have the Hamiltonian \begin{equation} H=\mathrm A\sigma_{x}+\mathrm C\sigma_{z}\,,\quad \mathrm A=E_J\,, \:\: \mathrm C=\left[4E_c\left(1-n_g\right)\right] \tag{01}\label{eq1} \end{equation} We must find a rotation in real space $\:\mathbb{R}^{3}\:$ so that for the new Hamiltonian \begin{equation} H'=\mathrm B\sigma_{z} \tag{02} \end{equation} The rotation must be(1) around the $\:y-$axis through an angle $\:-\theta\:$ represented by the following special unitary matrix
\begin{equation} \!\!\!\!\!\!U=\cos\frac{\theta}{2}I+i\sin\frac{\theta}{2}\sigma_{y} \,,\quad \theta =\arctan\left(\dfrac{\mathrm A}{\mathrm C}\right)= \arctan \left[\frac{E_J}{4E_c\left(1-n_g\right)} \right]\,,\quad \theta \in [0,\pi] \tag{03}\label{eq3} \end{equation} In the following $\:\omega=\frac{\theta}{2}:$

\begin{align} \!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!H'&\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!= UHU^{*} =\left(\cos\omega I+i\sin\omega\sigma_{y}\right)\left(\mathrm A\sigma_{x}+\mathrm C\sigma_{z}\right)\left(\cos\omega I-i\sin\omega\sigma_{y}\right) \nonumber\\ & \!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!= \left(\mathrm A\cos\omega \sigma_{x}+i\mathrm A\sin\omega\sigma_{y}\sigma_{x}+\mathrm C\cos\omega \sigma_{z}+i\mathrm C\sin\omega\sigma_{y}\sigma_{z}\right)\left(\cos\omega I-i\sin\omega\sigma_{y}\right) \nonumber\\ &\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\! = \mathrm A\cos^{2}\omega \sigma_{x}-i\mathrm A\cos\omega\sin\omega\sigma_{x}\sigma_{y}+i\mathrm A\cos\omega\sin\omega\sigma_{y}\sigma_{x}+\mathrm A\sin^{2}\omega\sigma_{y} \sigma_{x}\sigma_{y} \nonumber\\ &\:\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!+\mathrm C\cos^{2}\omega \sigma_{z}-i\mathrm C\cos\omega\sin\omega\sigma_{z}\sigma_{y}+i\mathrm C\cos\omega\sin\omega\sigma_{y}\sigma_{z}+\mathrm C\sin^{2}\omega\sigma_{y} \sigma_{z}\sigma_{y} \nonumber\\ &\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\! \!=\!\mathrm A \left(\cos^{2}\omega\!-\!\sin^{2}\omega\right)\sigma_{x}\!+\!2 \mathrm A\cos\omega\sin\omega\sigma_{z}\!-\!2 \mathrm C\cos\omega\sin\omega\sigma_{x}\!+\!\mathrm C \left(\cos^{2}\omega\!-\!\sin^{2}\omega\right)\sigma_{z} \nonumber\\ &\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\! =\left(\mathrm A\sin\theta+\mathrm C \cos\theta\right)\sigma_{z}+\left(\mathrm A\cos\theta-\mathrm C \sin\theta\right)\sigma_{x}=\left(\mathrm A\sin\theta+\mathrm C \cos\theta\right)\sigma_{z} \tag{04}\label{eq4} \end{align} that is, see equation \eqref{eq11}(2)

\begin{equation} H'=\sqrt{\mathrm A^{2}+\mathrm C^{2}}\:\sigma_{z}= \sqrt{E_J^{2}+\left[4E_c\left(1-n_g\right)\right]^{2}}\:\sigma_{z} \tag{05} \end{equation}

In \eqref{eq4} we make use of Pauli matrices properties, see equations \eqref{eq12a} and \eqref{eq12b}.(3)


(1) The reasoning :

The Pauli matrices \begin{equation} \sigma_{x}= \begin{bmatrix} 0 & \!\!\hphantom{\boldsymbol{-}}1 \vphantom{\tfrac{a}{b}}\\ 1 & \!\!\hphantom{\boldsymbol{-}}0\vphantom{\tfrac{a}{b}} \end{bmatrix} \: , \:\:\: \sigma_{y}= \begin{bmatrix} 0 & \!\!\boldsymbol{-} i \vphantom{\tfrac{a}{b}}\\ i & \!\!\hphantom{\boldsymbol{-}} 0\vphantom{\tfrac{a}{b}} \end{bmatrix} \: , \:\:\: \sigma_{z}= \begin{bmatrix} 1 & \!\!\hphantom{\boldsymbol{-}} 0 \vphantom{\frac{a}{b}}\\ 0 & \!\!\boldsymbol{-} 1\vphantom{\frac{a}{b}} \end{bmatrix} \tag{06} \end{equation} are the hermitian traceless matrix representations of the unit vectors \begin{equation} \mathbf{i}= \begin{bmatrix} 1 \vphantom{\tfrac{a}{b}}\\ 0 \vphantom{\tfrac{a}{b}}\\ 0 \vphantom{\tfrac{a}{b}} \end{bmatrix} \: , \:\:\: \mathbf{j}= \begin{bmatrix} 0 \vphantom{\tfrac{a}{b}}\\ 1 \vphantom{\tfrac{a}{b}}\\ 0 \vphantom{\tfrac{a}{b}} \end{bmatrix} \: , \:\:\: \mathbf{k}= \begin{bmatrix} 0 \vphantom{\tfrac{a}{b}}\\ 0 \vphantom{\tfrac{a}{b}}\\ 1 \vphantom{\tfrac{a}{b}} \end{bmatrix} \tag{07} \end{equation} along the $\:x,y, z\:$ axis respectively according to the following bijection (one-to-one and onto correspondence) between $\mathbb{R}^3$ and the space of $2\times2$ hermitian traceless matrices, let it be $\mathbb{H}$ : \begin{equation} \mathbf{w}=(x,y,z)\in \mathbb{R}^3\;\longleftarrow\!\longrightarrow \; W= \begin{bmatrix} z & x-iy \\ x+iy & -z \end{bmatrix} \in \mathbb{H} \tag{08} \end{equation} Under this interpretation the Hamiltonian $\:H\:$ of equation \eqref{eq1} is the hermitian traceless matrix representation of the vector \begin{equation} \!\!\!\!\!\!\mathbf{h}\!=\!\mathrm A \mathbf{i}+\mathrm C \mathbf{k}\!=\! \begin{bmatrix} \mathrm A \vphantom{\tfrac{a}{b}}\\ 0 \vphantom{\tfrac{a}{b}}\\ \mathrm C \vphantom{\tfrac{a}{b}} \end{bmatrix} \!=\! \begin{bmatrix} E_J \vphantom{\tfrac{a}{b}}\\ 0 \vphantom{\tfrac{a}{b}}\\ 4E_c\left(1-n_g\right) \vphantom{\tfrac{a}{b}} \end{bmatrix} \, , \: \Vert \mathbf{h}\Vert^{2}=\mathrm A^{2}+\mathrm C^{2}=E_J^{2}+\left[4E_c\left(1-n_g\right)\right]^{2} \tag{09}\label{eq9} \end{equation} But if we want under a rotation the new Hamiltonian to be $\:H'=\mathrm B\sigma_{z}\:$ then this Hamiltonian will be the hermitian traceless matrix representation of the vector \begin{equation} \mathbf{h'}\!=\!\Vert \mathbf{h}\Vert\:\mathbf{k}\!=\!\sqrt{\mathrm A^{2}+\mathrm C^{2}}\:\mathbf{k}\!=\! \begin{bmatrix} 0 \vphantom{\tfrac{a}{b}}\\ 0 \vphantom{\tfrac{a}{b}}\\ \sqrt{\mathrm A^{2}+\mathrm C^{2}} \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix} 0 \vphantom{\tfrac{a}{b}}\\ 0 \vphantom{\tfrac{a}{b}}\\ \sqrt{E_J^{2}+\left[4E_c\left(1-n_g\right)\right]^{2}} \end{bmatrix} \tag{10}\label{eq10} \end{equation} So, the rotation we try to find must rotate the vector $\:\mathbf{h}\:$ of \eqref{eq9} to the vector $\:\mathbf{h'}\:$ of \eqref{eq10}. The most simple rotation we have to do it is that given by \eqref{eq3}.

In the Figure below we see the vectorial in $\:\mathbb{R}^{3}\:$ representation of the $2\times2$ hermitian traceless matrices $\:\sigma_{x},\sigma_{y},\sigma_{z},H,H'$.

enter image description here


(2) \begin{equation} \dfrac{\sin\theta}{\cos\theta}=\tan\theta \stackrel{defin. (03)}{=\!=\!=\!=\!=\!=}\dfrac{\mathrm A }{\mathrm C }\Longrightarrow \left. \begin{cases} \sin\theta=\dfrac{\mathrm A}{\sqrt{\mathrm A^{2}+\mathrm C^{2}}}\\ \cos\theta=\dfrac{\mathrm C}{\sqrt{\mathrm A^{2}+\mathrm C^{2}}} \end{cases} \right\} \Longrightarrow \left. \begin{cases} \mathrm A\sin\theta+\mathrm C \cos\theta=\sqrt{\mathrm A^{2}+\mathrm C^{2}}\vphantom{\dfrac{\mathrm A}{\sqrt{\mathrm A^{2}+\mathrm C^{2}}}}\\ \mathrm A \cos\theta-\mathrm C\sin\theta=0\vphantom{\dfrac{\mathrm A}{\sqrt{\mathrm A^{2}+\mathrm C^{2}}}} \end{cases} \right\} \tag{11}\label{eq11} \end{equation}


(3) Pauli matrices properties used : \begin{align} \sigma_{x}\sigma_{y} & = \boldsymbol{-}\sigma_{y}\sigma_{x}=i\sigma_{z}\,, \quad \sigma_{y} \sigma_{x}\sigma_{y} =\boldsymbol{-}\sigma_{x} \tag{12a}\label{eq12a}\\ \sigma_{y}\sigma_{z} & = \boldsymbol{-}\sigma_{z}\sigma_{y}=i\sigma_{x}\,, \quad \sigma_{y} \sigma_{z}\sigma_{y} =\boldsymbol{-}\sigma_{z} \tag{12b}\label{eq12b} \end{align}

| cite | improve this answer | | | | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks, @Frobenius for an illustrative explanation. Could you provide some reference for the bijection(one-to-one and onto correspondence) you mentioned? $\endgroup$ – Akhil Pratap Singh Jul 20 '18 at 15:16
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Akhil Pratap Singh : I don't have a specific reference. I learned about this self-studing about the representation of rotations by unitary matrices SU(2). Take a look for this subject in my answer here : Why is there this relationship between quaternions and Pauli matrices? $\endgroup$ – Frobenius Jul 20 '18 at 15:32
  • $\begingroup$ Why does the second term containing $\sigma_x $ vanishes in the last step of the Eq.(4)? $\endgroup$ – Akhil Pratap Singh Jul 20 '18 at 16:29
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Akhil Pratap Singh : $$ \dfrac{\sin\theta}{\cos\theta}=\tan\theta \stackrel{defin. (03)}{=\!=\!=\!}\dfrac{\mathrm A }{\mathrm C }\Longrightarrow \mathrm A \cos\theta-\mathrm C\sin\theta=0 $$ see also the footnote (2) at the end of answer. $\endgroup$ – Frobenius Jul 20 '18 at 19:27

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.