2
$\begingroup$

In Statistcal Mechanics, in the grand canonical ensemble, the "fugacity" $z$ is introduced and it is defined as

$z = e^{\frac{\mu}{kT}}$

(of course $\mu$ id the chimical potential and K the Boltzsmann's constant).

We can also define the grand-partition function,

$q(z,V,T) = ln \left( \Sigma_{N_s=0}^{+\infty}z^{N_s}Q_{N_s}(V,T) \right)$

where $N_s$ is a fixed number of particle in an element of our ensemble and $Q(V,T)$ is the canonical partition function.

It can be shown that in the grand-canonical description, the mean energy, $U$ is equal to

$U= kT^2 \left[ \frac{\partial}{\partial T} q(z,V,T)\right]_{z,V}$.

Well, later, in Pathria's book is written the following equation, but, to me, it isn't obvious:

$\left(\frac{\partial U}{\partial T}\right)_{z,V}= \left(\frac{\partial U}{\partial T}\right)_{N,V} + \left(\frac{\partial U}{\partial N}\right)_{T,V} \left(\frac{\partial N}{\partial T}\right)_{z,V} .$

Can anyone help me please?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

This is a very complicated way to write the chain rule (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chain_rule).

The idea is that here, $z$ is a function of $N, T$ and V : $z = z(N,T,V)$ . In general, $U$ is a function of $N, T, V$ : $U = U(T,N,V)$. However, one of those three variables can be replaced by $z$. So one has :

$$U(N, T, V) = U (z(N,T,V), T, V) = U(z, T, V)$$

In mathematics, $U(N, T, V)$ and $U(z, T, V)$ would be two different functions. However, as they represent the same physical quantity, physicists denote it the same. In order to know the arguments of the function, one uses parenthesis :

$$\left(\frac{\partial U}{\partial T}\right)_{z,V}$$ means the partial derivative of U with respect to T when U is expressed as $U(z, T, V)$.

Finally, the chain rule gives that

$$\left(\frac{\partial U}{\partial T}\right)_{z,V}= \left(\frac{\partial U}{\partial N}\right)_{T,V} \left(\frac{\partial N}{\partial T}\right)_{z,V} + \left(\frac{\partial U}{\partial T}\right)_{N,V} \left(\frac{\partial T}{\partial T}\right)_{z,V} + \left(\frac{\partial U}{\partial V}\right)_{N,T} \left(\frac{\partial V}{\partial T}\right)_{z,V} $$

And as $\left(\frac{\partial V}{\partial T}\right)_{z,V} = 0$ and $\left(\frac{\partial T}{\partial T}\right)_{z,V} = 1$, one reaches

$$\left(\frac{\partial U}{\partial T}\right)_{z,V}= \left(\frac{\partial U}{\partial T}\right)_{N,V} + \left(\frac{\partial U}{\partial N}\right)_{T,V} \left(\frac{\partial N}{\partial T}\right)_{z,V}$$.

If needed I can be more rigorous and introduce properly the substitution but this is tedious and not very helpful I think.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.