1
$\begingroup$

I have seen a video on youtube where Feynman explains that engines of trains are heavy to compensate for the fact that steel has a low coefficient of friction.

But, whereas this seems plausible for the old steam engines, new trains are significantly lighter.

How these trains are going up an acclivity?

$\endgroup$

closed as off-topic by Sebastian Riese, Jon Custer, stafusa, Bill N, Kyle Kanos Jul 12 '18 at 10:02

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "This question appears to be about engineering, which is the application of scientific knowledge to construct a solution to solve a specific problem. As such, it is off topic for this site, which deals with the science, whether theoretical or experimental, of how the natural world works. For more information, see this meta post." – Sebastian Riese, Jon Custer, stafusa, Bill N, Kyle Kanos
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • 3
    $\begingroup$ The same principle operates with modern trains - perhaps they're just heavier than you think? Related/possible duplicate: Grip of the train wheels $\endgroup$ – lemon Jul 8 '18 at 12:04
  • $\begingroup$ @lemon I think that they are lighter $\endgroup$ – veronika Jul 8 '18 at 12:52
  • $\begingroup$ Having a heavy main train locomotive to pull the rest of the train cars probably isn't as much of an issue nowadays for the simple reason that there often isn't a main locomotive responsible for doing all the work of pulling the rest of the train. For trains like SF Bay Area's BART or many Japanese commuter trains or the Shinkansen, all of the cars in the train have electric motors and so all of the cars contribute equally to moving the train forward. $\endgroup$ – Samuel Weir Jul 8 '18 at 17:41
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ "I think that they are lighter", without any evidence to back it up, is a bit thin on the justification, isn't it? $\endgroup$ – Emilio Pisanty Jul 9 '18 at 17:16
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Quantumspaghettification Even if there were a difference, it would fall to OP to do the research and show that the effect was actually real. $\endgroup$ – Emilio Pisanty Jul 9 '18 at 20:25
1
$\begingroup$

The difference is that older trains were pulled by one engine, which provided the pulling force for the whole train. The amount of traction this engine could provide was limited by the weight of the engine. Modern trains have motors located in each carriage, so the traction force is spread throughout the train instead of concentrated at the engine.

Electric trains are lighter because they do not need to carry their own fuel. Power is generated externally and supplied to the train through electrified rails or cables.

$\endgroup$

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.