Simple question: as the title says, what makes a real Feynman diagram real, and what makes a virtual diagram virtual? Or in other words, how do I tell whether any given diagram is real or virtual? I've never gotten a really satisfying explanation of this. I would imagine it has something to do with virtual particles, but all internal propagators are virtual particles and I know for a fact that having internal lines doesn't make a diagram virtual.
$\begingroup$
$\endgroup$
3
-
1$\begingroup$ Hi David. Must admit I've never heard of a "virtual Feynman diagram" before. Do you have a reference for that? $\endgroup$– twistor59Commented Oct 23, 2012 at 9:17
-
1$\begingroup$ arxiv.org/abs/1112.1061 in the abstract, arxiv.org/abs/1012.0507 above equation 4, arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9701284 in figure 1, and in the form "virtual contributions" (same meaning) arxiv.org/abs/1108.1752 above equation 10 and arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0109115 in the abstract. Also I think I've seen this usage in at least one textbook but I can't check it at this time. $\endgroup$– David ZCommented Oct 23, 2012 at 16:04
-
$\begingroup$ I discerned from the papers the meaning of their terminology. See my updated answer. $\endgroup$– Arnold NeumaierCommented Oct 24, 2012 at 9:52
Add a comment
|
3 Answers
$\begingroup$
$\endgroup$
1
In the normal usage, real and virtual are not properties of Feynman diagrams themselves, but of the particles depicted in them. The particles corresponding to external lines (attached to at most one vertex only) are real, the others (attached to two vertices) are virtual.
A Feynman diagram may be considered as a repetitive part of a bigger diagram. This requires that the external lines of the diagram are kept off-shell, so that the corresponding integrals depend on off-shell momenta (rather than only on-shell momenta, which would suffice for S-matrix elements). Their computation is more complex as one has to account for a bigger parameter space. The use of off-shell Feynman diagrams in this sense is that they can be used in resummation techniques as building blocks of infinite families of on-shell Feynman diagrams. Indeed, such a recursive usage necessitates treating the external lines as virtual. As with virtual particles, such off-shell Feynman diagrams have no measurable counterpart but are just intermediate expressions in the resummation calculation.
However, in papers such as http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0550321379901160, a virtual Feynman graph is simply an ordinary Feynman graph involving a loop, in contrast to a real Feynman graph = lowest order tree graph. See the explanation after eqs. (42) and (81). This paper is quoted in http://arxiv.org/abs/1012.0507 after eq. (3) for details about virtual diagrams. In http://arxiv.org/abs/1112.1061, this terminology applies to the graphs cut at the lines in Fig. 1, corresponding to a factorization. http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9701284 also uses this terminology; see the titles of Sections 3.1 and 3.2, and the corresponding figures.
answered Oct 23, 2012 at 9:20
-
$\begingroup$ It does seem like your last paragraph may be the answer I was looking for, but I really thought the distinction was something more than tree diagrams vs. loop diagrams. I'll see if I can figure out why I thought that. $\endgroup$– David ZCommented Oct 24, 2012 at 23:48
$\begingroup$
$\endgroup$
3
If I understand your question correctly its just a matter of what you are calculating whether you put the external particles on shell or not. If you are, for example, calculating an amplitude to use for a cross section, you'll put the external particles on-shell and it will be what you call a 'real Feynman diagram'. If you are calculating an effective action you might draw the same exact diagrams as you do for a cross section calculation, but you leave the particles off-shell, or what you are referring to as a 'virtual Feynman diagram'.
-
$\begingroup$ I know that the diagrams I'm asking about have external lines on-shell, so this isn't the distinction I'm looking for. Though unfortunately I can't offer much else in the way of explanation, only a few examples of usage - if I knew what I was referring to, I wouldn't be asking the question ;-) $\endgroup$– David ZCommented Oct 24, 2012 at 0:45
-
$\begingroup$ @DavidZaslavsky - I sort of figured you already knew that much, and I debated even posting it. Im still not clear though - is there a further distinction (i.e. subclasses of virtual vs real diagrams) you are asking about? Do you think something I wrote contradicts something in the links you provided? $\endgroup$– DJBunkCommented Oct 24, 2012 at 15:13
-
$\begingroup$ Yes, I do. There are some in the links I provided where virtual diagrams have their external lines on-shell, which contradicts your statement that external lines of virtual diagrams are off-shell. $\endgroup$– David ZCommented Oct 24, 2012 at 23:44
$\begingroup$
$\endgroup$
Feynman diagrams are just that: diagrams. Real or virtual is what the particles depicted in them can be. A distinction should be made:
In order to calculate an amplitude, one needs to integrate over all possible momenta of internal lines. Therefore, those propagators can be thought as virtual. Effectively, one sums over all virtuality levels of the internal lines.
External lines are not as simple. While most are usually real, many are not. For instance, you can produce a pair of Z bosons from a total energy smaller than twice the Z boson mass. In that case one of the Z bosons will be virtual. If you measure it, you'll not find the Z boson mass, but something lower. The same applies to the Drell-Yan process, where a virtual photon is created from quark-antiquark annihilation. These photons are massive, while real photons are massless.
Bottom line: diagrams are what they are. What comes out of them can be on-mass-shell (real particle) or off-mass-shell (virtual particle).
