1
$\begingroup$

The Planck charge and mass values seem rather unusual. Is this an indicator that there is a lack of understanding in current theory, or is there a logical explanation for the magnitude of these two numbers? I read in a paper by Forsythe, that Planck mass might be the geometric mean between the mass of the smallest possible particle and the mass of the universe. Could this be correct?

$\endgroup$

marked as duplicate by Qmechanic Jul 4 '18 at 4:36

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

  • $\begingroup$ Link to the paper you mention, although frankly that sounds like nonsense to me. $\endgroup$ – StephenG Jul 4 '18 at 1:03
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ "Could this be correct? " - how could we know? $\endgroup$ – Alfred Centauri Jul 4 '18 at 1:30
  • $\begingroup$ The large value of the Planck mass is a reflection of the weakness of gravitational interactions. $\endgroup$ – safesphere Jul 4 '18 at 1:45
  • $\begingroup$ vixra.org/abs/1306.0045 $\endgroup$ – user199479 Jul 4 '18 at 2:16
  • $\begingroup$ Any comments on the meaning behind Planck charge. This value seems so unlikely? $\endgroup$ – user199479 Jul 4 '18 at 2:20