4
$\begingroup$

This might be a stupid question.

In Bailin and Love's "Cosmology in gauge field theory and string theory", the authors are describing how to calculate the effective potential at a finite temperature $T$ (Section 2.3, Pg. 42). Initially, they start with the treatment in zero-temperature.

They start by saying:

In quantum field theory at zero temperature, the expectation value $\phi_c$ of a scalar field $\phi$ (also referred to as the classical field) is determined by minimizing the effective potential $V(\phi_c)$. The effective potential contains a tree-level potential term, which can be read off from the Hamiltonian density, and quantum corrections from various loop orders.

I can understand this. However, they go on to claim (with $\phi(x)=\phi_c+\tilde{\phi}(x)$),

The one-loop quantum correction is calculated by shifting the fields $\phi$ by their expectation values $\phi_c$ and isolating the terms $\mathcal{L}_\mathrm{quad}(\phi_c,\tilde{\phi})$ in the Lagrangian density which are quadratic in the shifted fields $\tilde{\phi}$.

This is the statement I am a bit confused about. Why do we only isolate terms that are quadratic in the $\tilde{\phi}$, but not higher powers? There may be self-interaction terms; do these not contribute to the one-loop correction?

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Short answer: It's just an approximation, a Gaussian/stationary-phase approximation. If you keep $\hbar$ dimensionful (i.e. $\neq 1$), then the expansion can also be shown to be an expansion in powers of $\hbar$ (i.e. loops). $\endgroup$ – Arturo don Juan Apr 18 at 17:07
2
$\begingroup$

This result can be seen diagrammatically. The effective action is computed by summing over 1PI diagrams. A term $(\phi_c)^n \tilde{\phi}^m$ in the effective action corresponds to a vertex with $n$ $\phi_c$ legs, which are the external classical field, and $m$ $\tilde{\phi}$ legs, which we are integrating over and hence appear in internal lines.

One example of a one-loop contribution is:

enter image description here

where I've shamelessly stolen the graphic from these lecture notes. Here the dotted lines represent $\tilde{\phi}$ legs and the solid lines represent external $\phi_c$ legs. To find the contribution to the $(\phi_c)^n$ term of the effective potential, one must sum over all such diagrams with $n$ external $\phi_c$ legs.

Note that in this diagram, all of the vertices have $m = 2$, i.e. we are only considering quadratic terms in $\tilde{\phi}$. You can convince yourself by drawing a few diagrams that any higher-order terms would require more than one loop. The presence of linear terms ($m = 1$) would mess up this counting, which is why Bailin and Love expand about the classical minimum.

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

That the one-loop quantum correction

$$ \exp\left(\frac{i}{\hbar}\Gamma_{\text{1-loop}}[\phi_{\rm cl}]\right) ~\stackrel{(13)}{=}~ {\rm Det}\left(\frac{1}{i}\frac{\delta^2 S[\phi_{\rm cl}]}{\delta \phi_{\rm cl}^k \delta \phi_{\rm cl}^{\ell}}\right)^{-1/2}$$ $$~\stackrel{\text{Gauss. int.}}{\sim}~\int\!{\cal D}\frac{\eta}{\sqrt{\hbar}} ~\exp\left(\frac{i}{2\hbar}\eta^k \frac{\delta^2 S[\phi_{\rm cl}]}{\delta \phi_{\rm cl}^k \delta \phi_{\rm cl}^{\ell}}\eta^{\ell} \right) $$ $$~=~ \int\!{\cal D}\frac{\eta}{\sqrt{\hbar}} ~\exp\left(\left.\frac{i}{\hbar} S[\phi_{\rm cl}+\eta]\right|_{\text{quadratic in }\eta} \right) $$

to the effective/proper action $\Gamma[\phi_{\rm cl}]$ is given by the determinant of the Hessian of the action $S$ is e.g. proven in eq. (13) in my Phys.SE answer here. That proof relied on the stationary phase/WKB approximation, which, in turn, explains why only quadratic fluctuations $\eta$ contribute.

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for the very helpful links. This makes it very clear. $\endgroup$ – Sayan Mandal Jul 2 '18 at 13:56

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.