2
$\begingroup$

Liouville's theorem states that the density of phase space governs the continuity equation. $$\frac{\partial\rho}{\partial t}+\sum_{i=1}^n\Big(\frac{\partial(\rho\dot{q_i})}{\partial q_i}+\frac{\partial(\rho\dot{p_i})}{\partial p_i}\Big)=0$$ This means that the number of states in your statistical system is conserved in time.

My question is, is there a similar structure to the density of spacetime $\sqrt{-g}$? Is the volume of spacetime conserved? If you want to think of the geometry of spacetime as physical, I feel like there must be something which could be interpreted as a continuity equation for the density of spacetime $\sqrt{-g}$, spacetime events shouldn't disappear for no reason!

Perhaps the continuity equation would read something like this: $$\big(\sqrt{-g}\frac{dx^\mu}{d\tau}\big)_{;\mu}=0$$ Where $x^\mu$ is somehow tracking a spacetime event's evolution. I am unable to find any results of this kind in a general relativity textbook, even though it seems like such an important question to me. What if this equation is nonzero? What makes it nonzero? The presence of matter?

Edit: I realize now that in order to define this continuity equation properly, it would need to involve the induced metric $h_{\mu\nu}$ of a set of space like surfaces, with a time like normal vector $n$ for each surface, and the equation would then read something like $$\big(\sqrt{h}\frac{dx^\mu}{dn}\big)_{;\mu}=0$$ The $x^{\mu}$'s should be geodesics of the full spacetime with initially velocities normal to one of these space like surfaces. For every point on this surface, there corresponds a geodesic, so the $x^{\mu}$'s depend on the location on the surface.

$\endgroup$
2
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ There is no Liouville theorem for generic spacetimes. Think e.g. of gravitational lensing or the geodesic deviation equation. $\endgroup$ – Qmechanic Jun 24 '18 at 13:54
  • $\begingroup$ Gravitational lensing occurs in the presence of matter, correct? Since the density of spacetime is not equivalent to the curvature, it could be that there is a loss of spacetime events in the matter and a curvature is set up outside the matter to compensate for the lack of uniformity of spacetime events. I apologize for speaking in such an imprecise way, I haven't fully mastered GR or differential geometry. $\endgroup$ – fewfew4 Jun 24 '18 at 14:01
1
$\begingroup$

For a general Riemannian or pseudo-Riemannian manifold with metric $g$, the covariant derivative with the Levi-Civita connection satisfies,

$$\nabla_\mu \sqrt{|g|} = 0$$

where $g = \det g_{\lambda\sigma}$. This can be proved from the metric compatibility condition, $\nabla_\mu g_{\lambda\sigma} = 0 $ which the Levi-Civita connection ensures. In particular, it is obvious when expressing the determinant as,

$$g = \frac{1}{4!}\epsilon^{\alpha\beta\gamma\delta}\epsilon^{\mu\nu\lambda\sigma}g_{\alpha\mu}g_{\beta \nu}g_{\gamma\lambda}g_{\delta\sigma}.$$

The vanishing of the volume element under covariant differentiation is useful in manipulations with tensor densities, since these are constructed with factors of $\sqrt{|g|}$.

This isn't really a physical fact though, it's just a consequence of differential geometry. If we take your proposal,

$$\nabla_\mu(\dot x^\mu \sqrt{|g|}) = 0$$

since $\nabla_\mu \sqrt{|g|} = 0$, your suggestion is equivalent to, $\nabla_\mu \dot x^\mu = 0$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.