0
$\begingroup$

I have a project.. I've got a survey leveling rod which is about 8 feet high, 2 inches in diameter and about 8.5 lbs in weight. I'm envisioning a pair of gyroscopes that attach to the center of the rod being controlled by a circuit which calculates the direction and amount of power to send to each dc motor so that the rod is pulled in a certain direction. The vector it is being pulled by is generated by the GPS receiver and is in the form of front/back and left/right corrections and I'm trying to estimate how much power will be needed to generate enough force so that rod would lean in the direction it is supposed to go. Currently, people in the field visually look at a screen which indicates the direction to go to reach the desired set point.. I want to generate enough force so that it is essentially a physical feedback so the desired point could be located with your eyes closed.

I probably got some of my terminology wrong, I've been reading up on gyroscope physics and terminology, torque, precession, etc, but I don't consider myself enough of an expert right now so would probably mangle the terms if I tried to talk about them.

is it even possible to generate this type of force with small gyroscope?

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

I think there are some practical problems with the idea you are presenting here.

Before addressing my main point, let me first get something out of the way that would confuse things.

In the video you linked to, showing that nifty self-balancing rod, the operating principle is not gyroscopic effect. The orienting mechanism of those wheels is called 'reaction wheels'. When the reaction wheel spins up around its axis the structure that it is attached to will rotate the other way, in proportion to the respective moments of inertia.

The reaction wheel mechanism is much simpler than gyroscopic effect mechanism. For one thing, for gyroscopic effect the wheels need to spin quite fast. As you can see: in the case of that self-balancing rod contraption the wheels rotate quite slowly. If the tilt sensors are very sensitive the reaction wheels can react very early to any deviation from plum, and then a slow rotation rate is sufficient to maintain an upright position of the rod.

About the survey-rod-with-physical-feedback that you describe:

If I understand you correctly, the usage would be:
- hold on to the top of the survey rod, allowing the bottom end to swing freely
- move close to the set point
- activate the physical feedback
- the feedback mechanism should swing out the bottom end of the survey rod towards the set point

It seems to me that while some form of physical feedback would be interesting, using reaction wheels would be a case of over-engineering.

Your hand is wrapped around the survey stick: how about the surface of the stick providing some sort of pulsation to the hand holding the stick. You can have 4 areas, at 0, 90, 180, 270 degrees, that can pulsate in some way. That can tell your hand in which direction it must move in order to be straight above the set point.

Another consideration:
About the idea with reaction wheels: what should happen if the user does not respond right away to the nudge? Should the reaction wheel keep producing the same palpable push? The thing is, to do that the reaction wheel would have to keep increasing its spin rate. You feel the nudge as long as the spin rate keeps going up. But the reaction wheel cannot keep accelerating. At some point the angular velocity is maxed out and the acceleration has to level off. That is, after no more than a couple of seconds the nudging would drop off. I don't think that's a good user experience. Good feedback design is that the feedback is consistent and constant.

So yeah, I'm trying to talk you out of it.

If you need/want to do the reaction wheel idea anyway:
It seems to me that the constraint is how much weight increase for the survey rod is still acceptable. For a prototype use a motor-and-reaction-wheel-assembly that is just acceptable weightwise. If that turns out to be underpowered, then the idea is non-viable, if it is overpowered you go down in size as you iterate through prototypes.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you.. yes that was rather bone-headed to post that link.. A reaction wheel is quite different and not the way to go. The usage is more like this: * hold on to the middle of the survey road .. the rod will always be more or less vertical * move close to the set point * the physical feedback mechanism would probably swing from the center of the stick rather than the bottom so that it could push against the person holding it rather than swing and hit their feet for instance * the feedback mechanism could be activated far from set point to indicate direction $\endgroup$ – crow Jun 22 '18 at 23:24
  • $\begingroup$ the lit arrows indicating direction are already provided by the tablet device attached to the survey rod. $\endgroup$ – crow Jun 22 '18 at 23:39

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.