2
$\begingroup$

I'm reading simple harmonic oscillator problem in "Modern Quantum Mechanics" by J.J. Sakurai.
The approach is by defining the annihilation ($a^{t}$) and creation ($a$) operators, then a number operator is defined as the product between these operators $N=a^{t}a$. Also, an energy eigenket of $N$ is denoted by its eigenvalue $n$, that is, $$N|n\rangle=n|n\rangle.$$ Then we can find $$Na|n\rangle=(n-1)a|n\rangle$$ and the book says this implies $$a|n\rangle=c|n-1\rangle,$$ where $c$ is a numerical constant, the problem is I can't understand why this is true. I'm new with Dirac's notation, maybe that is the problem.

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

the problem is I can't understand why this is true

From your equation 1, we get that:

$$Nc|n-1\rangle = (n-1)c|n-1\rangle$$

Your equation 2 is:

$$Na|n\rangle = (n-1)a|n\rangle$$

Thus, it must be that

$$a|n\rangle = c|n-1\rangle $$

To be clear, $a$ is an operator that, given a ket, returns a ket so we could write something like

$$|m\rangle = a|n\rangle$$

and then your equation 2 becomes

$$N|m\rangle = (n-1)|m\rangle$$

which implies that $|m\rangle$ is proportional to $|n-1\rangle$, i.e.,

$$|m\rangle = c|n-1\rangle$$

$\endgroup$
5
$\begingroup$

This becomes more apparent with some parenthesis:

$$ N(a|n\rangle)=(n-1)(a|n\rangle) $$

Since $N$ yields an eigenvalue of $(n-1)$ when operating on the state $a|n\rangle$, then $a|n\rangle$ must be an eigenstate of $N$ with an eigenvalue of $(n-1)$, aka $|n-1\rangle$ (a overall phase factor/numerical constant $c$ could also be included in this state, which would be cancelled from both sides).

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

Your question is why the eigenvalue-$n-1$ eigenspace has dimension $1$. Since repeated application of $a$ can reduce the eigenvalue until it is $0$, while repeated application of $a^\dagger$ can increase the eigenvalue, each eigenspace has the same dimension. You can easily prove this dimension is $1$ in the $n=0$ case.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ So, if eigenspace hasn't dimension 1 the equality doesn't hold, does it? $\endgroup$ – Alberto Navarro Jun 17 '18 at 20:06
  • $\begingroup$ @AlbertoNavarro But it does have dimension $1$. Can you prove that for the eigenvalue-$0$ eigenspace? $\endgroup$ – J.G. Jun 17 '18 at 20:09

protected by Qmechanic Jun 18 '18 at 2:56

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.