0
$\begingroup$

My layman's understanding of one aspect of the wave/particle duality is that when we attempt to detect wave behavior we observe wave behavior, and when we measure to detect particle behavior we observe particle behavior.

The way that I understand the double-slit experiment is that the detector behind the slits is detecting particle hits, be they photons of light or what we classically describe as particles. So, I'm wondering if there have been experiments which use an array of antennae to observe the wave behavior after passing through the slits, rather than a particle/photon detector.


Footnote

I do understand that the wave function is mathematical tool that represents and predicts quantum behavior, and it is uncertain whether it describes physical matter. Since there is an issue of wave behavior, I'm interested in what we can learn about it.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Related: Is the wave-particle duality a real duality? $\endgroup$ – John Rennie Jun 15 '18 at 15:00
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Also: Are double-slit patterns really due to wave-like interference? $\endgroup$ – John Rennie Jun 15 '18 at 15:02
  • $\begingroup$ Interesting... so what would we see if we had an array of antennae that were sensitive to fluctuations in the quantum field? $\endgroup$ – NonSecwitter Jun 15 '18 at 15:10
  • $\begingroup$ The detection of the particles of the EM radiation seems to be more a fact (direct observed) as the wave nature, which is indirect observed only through the intensity distribution behind edges or slits. The question is a interesting because the intensity distribution behind slits is statically and the antennas will not receive any swelling signal. $\endgroup$ – HolgerFiedler Jun 15 '18 at 15:33
  • $\begingroup$ Not clear what you are asking about physics. "Has experiment X been done?" is a question about human activity, not about the physics of experiment X. It is not a useful question. $\endgroup$ – sammy gerbil Jun 19 '18 at 14:09
0
$\begingroup$

An array of antennae, each with its own detector, will still register each photon (or electron, or neutron, etc., depending on the type of experiment) as a single-particle hit, within the area covered by the antenna element. It would be possible to arrange the antenna array as a set of strips corresponding to the light and dark fringes in the diffraction pattern, then connect all the antennae that are in the dark fringes to one detector and all the antennae in the light fringes to another detector. The second detector would collect almost all the hits: we wouldn't know where the hit occurred within each sub-array.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.