0
$\begingroup$

SSH model can be written as $$H=-\sum_n\big[Jc_n^\dagger d_n + J'd_n^\dagger c_{n+1}\big]+h.c.$$ in Fourier space $$H(k)= \begin{bmatrix} c_k^\dagger && d_{k}^\dagger \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} 0 && -Je^{ik}-J'e^{-ik}\\ -Je^{-ik}-J'e^{ik} && 0 \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} c_k \\ d_{k} \end{bmatrix}\\ $$ $$h(k)=h_1\sigma_1+h_2\sigma_2+h_3\sigma_3$$ with $h_1=-(J+J')\cos{k}$,$h_2=-(J-J')\sin{k}$ and $h_3=0$

Winding number is defined as: $$\nu=\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{-\pi}^\pi dk \frac{h_1\partial_kh_2-h_2\partial_kh_1}{h_1^2+h_2^2}$$

Question:

It is known that winding number is $1$ for $J'>J$ and $0$ for $J>J'$ but when I calculated using above equation I found $-1$ and $1$ respectively. What am I missing?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Consider to spell out acronyms. $\endgroup$ – Qmechanic Jun 9 '18 at 6:32
1
$\begingroup$

Your notation is slightly different from: Asboth, where in Chapter 1 they cover the winding number of the SSH model. You can look there for help. But I think I know the answer to your problem.

I believe your fourier transformation is incorrect. It does not agree with what is found in Asboth on page 4. The thing is that the on-site potential term $$Jc_n^\dagger d_n$$ should not produce an exponential when you Fourier transform. Therefore I think that your Bloch Hamiltonian $h(k)$ whould look like this $$ \left(\begin{array}{cc} 0 & -J-J'e^{-ik}\\ -J-J'e^{ik} & 0 \end{array}\right). $$ Try calcuating the winding number with this matrix and see if you get the right answer.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ @LuqmanSaleem I don't really understand what you mean, maybe you can expand. At any rate, if you insist that your $h(k)$ matrix is correct then answer me this. Does $n$ label different unit cells? $\endgroup$ – Jens Roderus Jun 9 '18 at 19:40

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.