0
$\begingroup$

Starting from Dirac fields:

$$\Psi(x) = \dfrac{1}{(2\pi)^{3/2}} \int \dfrac{d^3k}{\sqrt{2\omega_k}}\sum_r\left[ c_r(k)u_r(k)e^{-ikx}+d^\dagger_r(k)v_r(k)e^{-ikx} \right]_{k_0=\omega_k}$$

$$\Psi^\dagger(x) = \dfrac{1}{(2\pi)^{3/2}} \int \dfrac{d^3k}{\sqrt{2\omega_k}}\sum_r\left[d_r(k)v^\dagger_r(k)e^{-ikx} + c^\dagger_r(k)u^\dagger_r(k)e^{ikx}\right]_{k_0=\omega_k} $$

where $\omega_k = \sqrt{\vec{k}^2+m^2}$.

The canonical quatization condition reads:

$$ \begin{cases} \{\Psi_\alpha(x), \Psi^\dagger_\beta(y)\}_t = \delta^{(3)}(\vec{x}-\vec{y})\ \ \delta_{\alpha\beta}\\ \{\Psi_\alpha(x), \Psi_\beta(y)\}_t = 0\\ \{\Psi^\dagger_\alpha(x), \Psi^\dagger_\beta(y)\}_t = 0\\ \end{cases} $$

In order to derive the quantization condition for the creation/annihilation operators I have to rewrite $c,c^\dagger,d,d^\dagger$ in terms of $\Psi$ and $\Psi^\dagger$.

For instance in order to derive the canonical quantization condition between $c,c^\dagger$ I can rewrite them as:

$$ c_r(k) = \dfrac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}^{3}} \int \dfrac{d^3x}{\sqrt{2\omega_k}} u_r^\dagger(k) \Psi(x) e^{ikx} $$

$$ c^\dagger_s(p) = \dfrac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}^{3}} \int \dfrac{d^3y}{\sqrt{2\omega_p}} \Psi^\dagger(y) u_s(p) e^{-ipy} $$

and then explicitly calculate the anti-commutator:

$$ \begin{split} \{c_r(k), c^\dagger_s(p)\}_t &= \dfrac{1}{(2\pi)^3} \int \dfrac{d^3xd^3y}{\sqrt{2\omega_k 2\omega_p}} \left[ u_r^\dagger(k) \Psi(x)\Psi^\dagger(y) u_s(p) + \Psi^\dagger(y) u_s(p)u_r^\dagger(k) \Psi(x) \right]e^{i(kx-py)}\\ &= \dfrac{1}{(2\pi)^3} \int \dfrac{d^3xd^3y}{\sqrt{2\omega_k 2\omega_p}} \left[ u_r^\dagger(k) \{\Psi(x), \Psi^\dagger(y)\} u_s(p)\right]e^{i(kx-py)}\\ &= \cdots \end{split} $$

But here I miss something: I don't understand why I can swap $u_s(p)$ and $u_r^\dagger(k)$ in the second term in order to recover the anti-commutator between $\Psi$ and $\Psi^\dagger$.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ In all the sacred textbooks is the other way round. You postulate the anticommutation relations for $c_r$ and $d_r$ and then, you are a simple step away from deriving the anticommutation relations for the fields. $\endgroup$ – Jon Jun 8 '18 at 14:27
0
$\begingroup$

You should proceed in contraction of the spinor indices and recall that e.g a pair $u^{\dagger}(k,r) \Psi(x) \equiv u^{\dagger}_{\alpha}(k,r) \Psi_{\alpha}(x)$, with $u^{\dagger}_{\alpha}(k,r)$ labelling the $\alpha^{\text{th}}$ component of the Dirac spinor $u^{\dagger}(k,r)$. Therefore,$$ \left\{c(k,r),c^{\dagger}(p,s)\right\} \sim \int d^3 x d^3 y \left(u^{\dagger}_{\alpha}(k,r) \Psi_{\alpha}(x)\Psi^{\dagger}_{\beta}(y) u_{\beta}(p,s) + \Psi^{\dagger}_{\beta}(y) u_{\beta}(p,s)u^{\dagger}_{\alpha}(k,r) \Psi_{\alpha}(x)\right) \\= \int d^3 x d^3 y \left(u^{\dagger}_{\alpha}(k,r) \left\{\Psi_{\alpha}(x),\Psi^{\dagger}_{\beta}(y)\right\} u_{\beta}(p,s)\right) = \dots = $$

Finish the exercise using your canonical quantisation field anticommutators together with orthogonality/completeness relations amongst the $u$'s.

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

Here $\Psi(x)$ is a column matrix having 4 components and $\Psi^\dagger(x)$ is a row matrix with 4 row elements (of course these elements are functions of $x$).

And when you are taking the anti-commutation, you are choosing one component(or element) $\Psi_\alpha(x)$ from (4$\times$1) column matrix $\Psi(x)$ and similarly you should choose one component $\Psi^\dagger_\beta(x)$ from (1$\times$4) row matrix $\Psi^\dagger(x)$. \begin{align} \Psi_\alpha(x) = \dfrac{1}{(2\pi)^{3/2}} \int \dfrac{d^3k}{\sqrt{2\omega_k}}\sum_{r=1,2}\left[ c_r(k)u_{r,\alpha}(k)e^{-ikx}+d^\dagger_r(k)v_{r,\alpha}(k)e^{-ikx} \right]_{k_0=\omega_k}\\ \Psi^\dagger_\beta(x) = \dfrac{1}{(2\pi)^{3/2}} \int \dfrac{d^3k}{\sqrt{2\omega_k}}\sum_{r=1,2}\left[d_r(k)v^\dagger_{r,\beta}(k)e^{-ikx} + c^\dagger_r(k)u^\dagger_{r,\beta}(k)e^{ikx}\right]_{k_0=\omega_k} \end{align} So, now you can see there $u$ and $v$ has two indices r and $\alpha$(or $\beta$), here $r$ can take values 1 and 2 while $\alpha$(or $\beta$) can take values 1,2,3,4.

Or simply $u_{r,\alpha}$ (or $v_{r,\alpha}$) is the $\alpha$-th component(or $\alpha$-th matrix element) of the (4$\times$1) column matrix $u_r$ (or $v_{r}$).

And similarly, $u_{r,\alpha}^\dagger$ (or $v_{r,\alpha}^\dagger$) is the $\alpha$-th component (or $\alpha$-th matrix element) of the (1$\times$4) row matrix $u_r^\dagger$ (or $v_{r}^\dagger$).

Thus $u_{r,\alpha}$, $v_{r,\alpha}$, $u_{r,\alpha}^\dagger$, $v_{r,\alpha}^\dagger$ all these are just numbers or the matrix elements, not the matrices.

So, you proceed the way you were going and easily swap $u_{s,\alpha}(p)$ and $u_{r,\alpha}(k)$ (in your notation) as they are just the numbers or the components(or elements) of the corresponding matrices.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.