1
$\begingroup$

Einstein's theory of relativity implies a B-theory of time. Deterministic interpretations of quantum mechanics such as the Many-Worlds would seem to be consistent with the B-theory. Regardless of whether time is fundamental or is described by the B-theory, does the MWI have a better explanatory scope than indeterministic interpretations?

$\endgroup$

closed as off-topic by Ben Crowell, Kyle Kanos, Emilio Pisanty, Qmechanic Jun 6 '18 at 11:12

  • This question does not appear to be about physics within the scope defined in the help center.
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it would be better suited to philosophy.SE. $\endgroup$ – Ben Crowell Jun 6 '18 at 1:02
  • $\begingroup$ A physical theory does not imply metaphysical nonsense. "Is time A-theory or B-theory?" is a meaningless question, its only value is in figuring out which interpretation helps you understand relativity and physics better. $\endgroup$ – Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir Jun 6 '18 at 4:29
  • $\begingroup$ There is no absolute time in relativity, so whatever philosophical theory of time one may come up with has to be more complex that either A or B-theories, which are different perspectives on a singly parametrized time dimension. In 4D spacetime, one can not single out a specific time dimension. Different foliations are always possible. The relevant concept is the causal structure, which is absolute. $\endgroup$ – Stéphane Rollandin Jun 6 '18 at 8:29
  • $\begingroup$ See arxiv.org/abs/1312.2866 for details concerning my above comment. $\endgroup$ – Stéphane Rollandin Jun 6 '18 at 9:28