In Appendix A, Polchinski does the Euclidean path integral for the Harmonic oscillator. After he Pauli-Villars regularizes the determinant of the kinetic term, he obtains the following expression (A.1.62):

$$ \langle q_f, U | q_i, 0 \rangle \to \left( \frac{\omega}{2 \sinh \omega U} \right)^{1/2} \exp \left[ - S_{cl}(q_i,q_f) + \frac{1}{2}\left( \Omega U - \ln \Omega \right) - S_{ct} \right] \tag{A.1.62}. $$

where $\Omega$ is a frequency scale.

In what follows he says:

"To get a finite answer as $\Omega \to \infty$, we need first to include a term $\frac{1}{2} \Omega$ in the Lagrangian $L_{ct}$, canceling the linear divergence in (A.1.62). That is, there is a linearly divergent bare coupling for the operator 1. It may seem strange that we need to renormalize in a quantum mechanics problem, but power counting is completely uniform with quantum field theory. The logarithmic divergence is a wavefunction renormalization.

What does the italic sentence mean? The operator $1$ should change by some $Z. 1$? Why the logarithm is a wave function renormalization? And is he power counting what?

  1. We allow counterterms $L_{\rm ct}= \sum_X \delta_X ~X$ of all possible field monomials/"operator" $X$ in the Lagrangian. Here we need $\delta_1 =\frac{\Omega}{2}$ for the constant monomial $X=1$.

  2. Since $\Omega$ appear linearly in $\delta_1$, we speak of a linear divergence. In principle $\Omega$ could have appeared in other powers, cf. power counting.

  3. The wave function renormalization (aka. field strenth renormalization) means that the normalization of the inner product$^1$ $\langle q_f, U | q_i, 0 \rangle$ is changed with a factor $\sqrt{\frac{\pi}{\Omega}}$. Upstairs in an exponential, this becomes a logarithm.


$^1$ Here $U=iT$ denotes Euclidian time.

  • $\begingroup$ For a usual harmonic oscillator, it looks like we fight one artefact ($\Omega$) with another one (counterterm), does it? $\endgroup$ – Vladimir Kalitvianski Jun 4 '18 at 14:23
  • $\begingroup$ Polchinski identifies them. $\endgroup$ – Qmechanic Jun 4 '18 at 14:27
  • $\begingroup$ No, seriously, in a usual harmonic oscillator we do not have any $\Omega$ at all, so its appearing and disappearing look artificial to me. Am I wrong? $\endgroup$ – Vladimir Kalitvianski Jun 4 '18 at 15:13

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.