1
$\begingroup$

If $\mathcal{O}$ is an hermitian operator in a system given by Hamiltonian $H$ and inverse temperature $\beta$, is $$\langle \mathcal{O} \mathcal{O} \rangle = Tr (e^{-\beta H} \mathcal{O} \mathcal{O})$$ always convergent, or do we have to regulate it ? I am assuming that the system is a very general quantum field theory and the hamiltonian is bounded from below.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Well it's simultaneously diagonal. So do a basis expansion and see.. $\endgroup$
    – user18764
    May 28, 2018 at 17:27

3 Answers 3

1
$\begingroup$

No.

Consider for example observables of the form $\mathcal O = e^{\beta H/2}$; the value exponentially increases as the probability exponentially decreases and you can get what's in principle an infinite sum of constant terms.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Your counter example is not really illustrative, because taking $\mathcal{O}$ to be a function of Hamiltonian itself, you often run into problems, and in practice $\mathcal{O}$ operator has a finite support over energy eigen basis. For instance Eigen-state thermalization hypothesis fails when the operator itself is considered as the Hamiltonian. $\endgroup$
    – Jaswin
    May 29, 2018 at 15:48
1
$\begingroup$

In general, the expectation value $tr(A e^{-\beta H})$ is not defined for a generic selfadjoint operator $A$ (of the form ${\cal O}^2$ or not) if it is unbounded as it is the standard situation in QFT.

$tr(A e^{-\beta H})$ however converges if (with the written order!) the range of $e^{-\beta H}$ belongs to the domain of $A$ and the composition is trace class.

As an example, the hypotheses are valid if $H$ is selfadjoint and bounded below, with pure point spectrum and the dimension of eigenspaces is finite and bounded. In this case, for instance, $A= H^n$ for $n=0,1,2, \ldots$ satisfies all conditions.

When the expectation value is not defined with the formula above, one may try to regularize taking some thermidynamical limit or directly use a more advanced formalism like the algebraic one, together with the KMS condition to characterize thermal states.

In QFT in Minkowski spacetime, for a free theory, $e^{-\beta H}$ though bounded is never trace class, since its spectrum is not a pure point spectrum. Therefore you always must regularize, independently from the choice of $A$, barring forced unphysical choices ($A$ of trace class).

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

Now I have a clear reason why thermal expectation value of a square of an operator is not convergent. In any generic field theory I can express the expectation value as $$ Tr (e^{-\beta H} O O) = \sum_{i,k} e^{-\beta e_{i} }O_{ik} O^*_{ik}$$ Since there is no damping factor in the summation k, the sum is not convergent for any theory and operator.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.