The scale factor satisfies the following equation - $$\frac{\dot a^{2}}{a^{2}} + \frac{k}{a^{2}} = \frac{8\pi G}{3} \rho(t)$$ where $k$ is constant proportional to total energy of the dynamical system. Now numerical value of $k$ can be absorbed in the definition of $a(t)$ by rescaling it hence $k$ can be treated having one of the three values $(0,\pm1)$. From this equation how can we show that cosmological scale factor $a(t)$ will have maximum value followed by a contracting phase to the universe if $k=1$ and $\Omega >1$, where $\Omega = \frac{\rho}{\rho_{c}}$.

I tried following - if $k=1$ and $\Omega >1$, we get - $$\frac{\dot a^{2}}{a^{2}} + \frac{1}{a^{2}} = \frac{8\pi G}{3} \rho_{c}\cdot(\Omega>1) >\frac{8\pi G}{3} \rho_{c}\cdot\Omega$$ $\implies \dot a^{2} + 1 > \frac{8\pi G}{3} \rho_{c}\cdot\Omega \cdot a^{2} \implies a < \bigg[ \frac{3(\dot a^{2} + 1)}{8\pi G\rho_{c}\cdot\Omega}\bigg]^\frac{1}{2} \implies a_{max} = \bigg[ \frac{3(\dot a^{2} + 1)}{8\pi G\rho_{c}\cdot\Omega}\bigg]^\frac{1}{2}$

But, from here how will I prove that this maximum value will be followed by a contracting phase to the universe?

To find the form of $a(t)$ we need to know $\Omega(t)$, Could somebody please tell what kind of models are available to determine $\Omega(t)$?

Ref: Theoretical Astrophysics, T.Padmanabhan, Vol 3, pg - 4

  • $\begingroup$ I guess, you have to solve the differential equation for $a(t)$. $\endgroup$ – Frederic Thomas May 23 '18 at 15:36
  • $\begingroup$ @FredericThomas But we need $\Omega(t)$ for that. $\endgroup$ – luv_phy May 25 '18 at 5:06

You don't know $\Omega(t)$. How $\Omega$ varies with time depends on the specific nature of $\Omega$, e.g. $\Omega_r \propto a^{-4}$, but $\Omega_m \propto a^{-3}$. A universe with different amounts of radiation and matter will have different behaviors for $\Omega(t)$.

However you do know that after this maximum value there will be a contracting phase. That comes from the definition of a maximum point - all nearby points have lower values than the maximum. So both approaching the maximum and going away from it, $a(t)$ must decrease. If it starts increasing again, there must be a minimum, which does not exist (from the differential equation you solved). Hence it keeps decreasing, until the assumptions that went into the calculation break down.

  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for the answer. I understand your point, so what leads to the expansion of universe to a maximum and then to a contraction phase? $\endgroup$ – luv_phy May 25 '18 at 10:54
  • $\begingroup$ @luv_phy as in, why is the universe expanding? $\endgroup$ – Allure May 25 '18 at 11:07

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.