In Sec. 2 of Landau & Lifshitz's Mechanics, they claim that

Thus the Lagrangian is defined only to within an additive total time derivative of any function of coordinates and time.

by proving that $L$ and $$L'=L+\frac{d}{dt}(f(q,t))$$ are equivalent as far as the least action principle is concerned.

However, is this condition necessary as well as sufficient? That is, can we deduce that $$L'=L+\frac{d}{dt}(f(q,t))$$ for some $f$ from their equivalence when taking the first variation of the action?

This is important because in Sec. 4, Landau tries to find the form of $L$ by requiring $$L'=L+\frac{d}{dt}(f(q,t)).$$ If the condition is not necessary, this shouldn't work.


No, in general the Lagrangians that obtain a given set of equations of motion are not of the form $L+\partial_t f$, or even $aL+\partial_f$. I asked and ultimately answered this question about an interesting counterexample. But (from Landau's likely context) all that matters is whether a transformation behaves as $\delta L =\partial_t f$ and hence is action-preserving.

| cite | improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.