5
$\begingroup$

According to this page of "Quan­tum Me­chan­ics for En­gi­neers" by Leon van Dom­me­len, for one particle the integral over all space:

$$I=\int (\nabla\psi)^2 + V\psi^2 \mathrm{d}^3\mathbf{r}\tag{1}$$ with $\psi$ a real one-particle wavefunction and $V$ a real potential, is the same as:

$$I'=\int (\nabla|\psi|)^2 + V|\psi|^2 \mathrm{d}^3\mathbf{r}.\tag{2}$$

What happens to points where the wavefunction changes sign?

I assume also, that the potential does not include spin and velocity terms, but I'm not sure.

Why should these integrals be equal? This argument is from a series of statements to prove that the ground state can be real, positive and unique. It seems trivial but I require this integral for a more serious problem.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ To answer "what happens to points where the wavefunction changes sign?", the article shows here ww2.eng.famu.fsu.edu/~dommelen/quantum/style_a/… that the sign cannot changes, and thus it's always the same. $\endgroup$ – rnels12 May 18 '18 at 11:12
  • $\begingroup$ Yeah @mels12 but that requires the above. $\endgroup$ – Mauricio May 18 '18 at 11:36
2
$\begingroup$

Leon van Dom­me­len is making the claim that for a differentiable real wave function $\psi:\mathbb{R}^3\to \mathbb{R}$, we have$^1$ $$ \nabla |\psi| ~=~{\rm sgn}(\psi)\nabla \psi, \tag{A}$$ so that the kinetic energy term in eqs. (1) & (2) is unchanged by replacing $\psi\to|\psi| $. He concludes that if a real wavefunction $\psi$ minimizes the expectation value $\frac{\langle \psi |\hat{H}|\psi\rangle}{\langle \psi |\psi\rangle}$ of the Hamiltonian operator, so does $|\psi|$.

--

$^1$ The absolute value $|\psi|$ is not necessarily differentiable, but eq. (A) still make sense in distribution theory.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Ok that's why I thought but that's seems fishy. If the argument is to use $|\psi|$ as a wavefunction, then its derivative can be easily discontinuous and then not a valid wavefunction. $\endgroup$ – Mauricio May 18 '18 at 19:20
  • $\begingroup$ Leon van Dom­me­len is apparently not assuming at this stage that the TISE is satisfied. $\endgroup$ – Qmechanic May 18 '18 at 19:41

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.