0
$\begingroup$

I was wondering how would Poisson statistics be used in a photodetectors to account for the number of events that I'm missing in my experiment. Say I have a material (scintillator, ...) that emits $n$ photons per particle and a Photomultiplier tube (PMT) or any other photodetector with quantum efficiency Q. If I have $N$ particles arriving to the detector, how would I use Poisson statistics to calculate the number of particles that I'm missing?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Do you mean missing due to the quantum efficiency? Or for some other (perhaps unknown) reason? $\endgroup$ – Bob Jacobsen May 18 '18 at 6:26
1
$\begingroup$

The convolution of a Poisson with a binomial is a Poisson - which makes life easy. $n$ will be Poisson, and $N$ will be Poisson with mean $nQ$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for the answer. $N$ is not a Poisson distribution, it is actually the real number of particles arriving to the detector, what I want to find out is $N_d$, the number of detected particles if I have a Poissonian distributed quantum efficiency $\endgroup$ – Juanjo May 18 '18 at 6:46
  • $\begingroup$ For each particle the number of photons is Poisson with mean $nQ$ So there is a probability $e^{-nQ}$ that no photons will be observed and you will miss it, meaning you have $Ne^{-nQ}/1-e^{-nQ}$ missing particles. If your detector has a higher threshold (how many photons are needed to qualify as a signal above background) adjust accordingly. $\endgroup$ – RogerJBarlow May 18 '18 at 6:56
  • $\begingroup$ Sorry @RogerJBarlow, I came back to this question and there is something I'm not getting. If the probability of detecting 0 photons is $e^{-nQ}$, the missing particles I have should be $Ne^{-nQ}$, right? where is the $1/1-e^{-nQ}$ factor coming from? $\endgroup$ – Juanjo Jun 23 '18 at 6:57

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.