0
$\begingroup$

Heat is the macroscopic phenomenon related to the kinetic energy of the particles. So, I wonder if there is a way to express the absolute temperature as the volume integral of the kinetic energy of the particles over a control volume.

I remember having found something like in Wikipedia, but without a proper reference, and I can't find it again anyway.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ In theory, you could just define temperature as $T=\oint_V v^2(\mathbf{x})\ dm$ $\endgroup$
    – user195162
    May 17, 2018 at 21:41
  • $\begingroup$ That simple ? How do you manage the consistency of units between K and m²/s².kg ? $\endgroup$ May 19, 2018 at 4:07

3 Answers 3

1
$\begingroup$

Given some particle distribution $f(t,\,\mathbf x,\,\mathbf v)$, one can define the pressure as, $$ p=\frac{1}{3}\operatorname{Tr}\left[\int m\mathbf w\mathbf wf\left(t,\,\mathbf x,\,\mathbf v\right)\,\mathrm d^3x\right] $$ where $\mathbf w=\mathbf v-\mathbf V$ is the relative velocity where $\mathbf v$ is the particle velocity and $\mathbf V$ the bulk flow. We also define the particle density, $$ n=\int f\left(t,\,\mathbf x,\,\mathbf v\right)\,\mathrm d^3x $$ Then, in thermodynamic equilibrium, the distribution function is essentially Maxwellian with some $T$, thus we can write $p=nT$ or, $$ T=p/n=\frac{1}{3n}\operatorname{Tr}\left[\int m\mathbf w\mathbf wf\left(t,\,\mathbf x,\,\mathbf v\right)\,\mathrm d^3x\right] $$ which may or may not be convenient to use.

$\endgroup$
7
  • $\begingroup$ I assume you write vectors in bold, but what are Tr and t here ? $\endgroup$ May 19, 2018 at 4:04
  • $\begingroup$ Tr is trace, t is time. $\endgroup$
    – J.G.
    May 19, 2018 at 6:10
  • $\begingroup$ @AurélienPierre yes, vectors are bold, as is standard convention, $t$ is time and Tr is the trace. Probably could just do a scalar product of $\lVert\mathbf w\rVert$, but it's sometimes nice to be complete. $\endgroup$
    – Kyle Kanos
    May 19, 2018 at 10:08
  • $\begingroup$ Standard just in America ;-) $\endgroup$ May 21, 2018 at 23:24
  • $\begingroup$ @AurélienPierre last I checked ISO 80000-2 standards are global, not American. $\endgroup$
    – Kyle Kanos
    May 21, 2018 at 23:26
0
$\begingroup$

Yes there is. Temperature is related to the average energy per degree of freedom in a system. For a volume of ideal gas containing N molecules, each having three degrees of freedom, the energy integrated over the volume is $E = \frac{3}{2}Nk_BT$. $k_B$ is Boltmann's constant.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ By any chance, do you have the analytic form of the original integral that leads to this result ? $\endgroup$ May 19, 2018 at 4:14
  • $\begingroup$ All you need to know is the total number of degrees of freedom in the volume. In the ideal gas case this is 3 per molecule, so the integral is simply $\frac{3}{2}kT\int{dV\rho}$ where $\rho$ is the molecular number density. $\endgroup$
    – my2cts
    May 19, 2018 at 7:47
0
$\begingroup$

I think what you're misremembering is an integral over temperature, such as $U=\int C_V dT$ expressing total thermal energy in terms of heat capacity.

$\endgroup$
1
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ No, I remember this one. I'm really looking for an equivalence motion-temperature at molecular level over a control volume. Which seems reasonable since it's 2 different kinds of energy. $\endgroup$ May 19, 2018 at 4:06

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.