0
$\begingroup$

While studying quantum key distribution, I came across this postulate which states that given two entangled particles A and B at Alice and Bob sites respectively, if Alice measures A to be $\uparrow$ polarized (along the x axis), then Bob can only measure B to be $\downarrow$ (along the x axis) but not the horizontal polarization $\leftarrow$ or $\rightarrow$ of B as well (along the y axis). This phenomena is interpreted by Heisenberg's uncertainty principle. That being said, I have the following question: From the articles that I have read about Heisenberg uncertainty principle, we cannot measure both the position and the momentum of a given particle with 100% accuracy. How this result is related to the interpretation mentioned above? I just cannot spot the relation.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I think there are too many questions here. I'd try asking just the first one, and then ask the second one in a separate post. Asking multiple questions in one post actually makes it less likely that you'll get an answer. $\endgroup$ – DanielSank May 14 '18 at 18:10
0
$\begingroup$

The Heisenberg uncertainty principle is just a re-statement in quantum mechanics of what is known as the Cauchy-Schwartz inequality in vector spaces (pure maths).

I will quote the result of what you can find a proof of here.

The general definition of the uncertainty principle is that:

$$\hat{\sigma}_A^2 \cdot \hat{\sigma}_A^2 \geq \left |\frac{1}{2}\langle \{\hat{A}, \hat{B} \} \rangle - \langle \hat{A} \rangle \langle \hat{B} \rangle \right|^2 + \left |\frac{1}{2}\langle [\hat{A}, \hat{B} ] \rangle \right |^2, $$

where $\hat{A}$ and $\hat{B}$ are any two operators in quantum mechanics, $\hat{\sigma}$ the operator corresponding to their deviation from the expectation value, e.g. $\hat{\sigma}_A = \hat{A} - \langle \hat{A} \rangle$. The $[ \dots, \dots]$ is their commutator, and $\{ \dots, \dots\}$ the anticommutator.

So, you can now apply this to any pair of operators you want.

In your case, $\hat{A} = S_z$ and $\hat{B} = S_y$. You know the (anti)commutation relationships between the Pauli matrices so you work from there.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.