2
$\begingroup$

Aren't the states of two identical particles always entangled even if they are not interacting? The states of two identical particles are either symmetric or antisymmetric i.e., cannot be written as product states.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Please read this other post and my answer to it. I think it will help you understand the question you've posted here. $\endgroup$ – DanielSank May 10 '18 at 20:28
5
$\begingroup$

Entanglement is only a meaningful concept when there is a well-defined notion of subsystems, which generally means spatially separated subsystems. Indeed, the notion of "product state" (or its converse, "entangled state") is only meaningful relative to a given tensor product decomposition of the Hilbert space, which implicitly defines a splitting into subsystems. Hence, it is not obvious that indistinguishable particles with an (anti-)symmetrised wavefunction can be truly regarded as entangled subsystems.

Nevertheless, Killoran, Cramer and Plenio (arXiv link) showed that this is indeed a genuine form of entanglement. That is, the entanglement formally associated with the symmetrised wave function of a system of indistinguishable bosons can be extracted into the equivalent amount of entanglement (asymptotically) between distinguishable modes. I believe a similar result was found also for fermions by Cavalcanti et al. (arXiv link).

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

Yes and no. Yes if you look at the formal definition, then yes, but this is not really what is meant. Only the full state in symmetrized, so when you have one particle going to Alice and one particle going to Bob and they perform e.g. a spin measurement, then already by the 'location' of the particle detection the symmetrization is 'voided', and now the question if the spin degrees are entagnled makes sense.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ An entangled state in one which cannot be written as a direct product state. So entanglement does not require physical interaction. @lalala $\endgroup$ – SRS May 10 '18 at 20:10
  • $\begingroup$ @SRS This is one definition of entanglement. Another definition is "a state is entangled, if you can do [favorite task which requires entanglement, e.g. teleportation to an arbitrary (two-level) quantum system] with it". $\endgroup$ – Norbert Schuch May 13 '18 at 15:18
  • $\begingroup$ 'voided'? @lalala $\endgroup$ – SRS May 13 '18 at 15:24
  • $\begingroup$ @SRS I will try to edit to be clearer. Might take a few days though. $\endgroup$ – lalala May 13 '18 at 16:55

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.