2
$\begingroup$

I'm not exactly sure how the mathematics would work here but if an electron or any charged particle were in the magnetic grasp of a magnetar and it's electromagnetic field somehow crossed the boundary of its binary Partners Event Horizon would the magnetar's electromagnetic field, electromagnetism being significantly stronger than gravity, be able to retrieve information from Beyond an event horizon? Now, I get the feeling the event horizon would dissolve the electromagnetic bonds; however, is there anywhere in the math that could allow for a black hole with x properties to have information siphoned by a magnetar with y properties?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Extremely strong electromagnetic fields like those near magnetars can increase the "rigidity" (i.e., resistance to developing curvature) of space-time. So it may be more appropriate to ask if the magnetar can affect the outer boundary of the event horizon of a nearby blackhole. $\endgroup$ – honeste_vivere Sep 6 '18 at 14:06
  • $\begingroup$ Not sure I understand. So, electromagnetism itself bends space-time? $\endgroup$ – Jimmy G. Sep 10 '18 at 17:53
  • $\begingroup$ No, electromagnetic fields can make space-time more rigid, i.e., less susceptible to curving. $\endgroup$ – honeste_vivere Sep 11 '18 at 13:19
  • $\begingroup$ So, theoretically possible for a magnetar to push back an event horizon, or affect its shape? $\endgroup$ – Jimmy G. Sep 11 '18 at 14:17
  • $\begingroup$ I do not recall how strong this affect can be other than it exists. I think magnetars can strongly affect it but I am not sure if they can prevent a black hole from forming or how much they could affect the event horizon. $\endgroup$ – honeste_vivere Sep 11 '18 at 14:23
1
$\begingroup$

Statements such as "electromagnetism is much stronger than gravity" have an extremely specialized meaning. In this case the statement refers to the typical magnitude of forces between elementary particles with a charge of a few units of elementary charge and masses comparable to those of usual Standard model particles. However, this comparison of force strengths is irrelevant for the example of the magnetar.

This is because the event horizon is not an instance of gravity being particularly strong. For example, on the horizon of supermassive black holes gravity is weak by any local measurement of the gravitational forces! To see that, you have to compare the space-time curvature. A back-of-the-envelope computation will then show you that a supermassive black hole with the mass of $10^9$ solar masses (and we know of such black holes) has a significantly smaller space-time curvature on its horizon than there is on the surface of the Earth.

So how does one characterize the event horizon? It is best characterized as an accumulated effect. The gravity curves the space-time for so long away from the "flat" state at spatial infinity that suddenly a causality change is possible. And there is really nothing local forces can do about that beyond that point. Drawing information from the black hole is then about as likely as bringing a message about the future. This can also be seen from the math. The direction "inside" at the black hole horizon actually becomes the direction "into the future" for any physical field or matter, including electromagnetic fields.

So no, a magnetar cannot draw information from behind the horizon of a black hole.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ What happens to the electromagnetic field of the magnetar? Is there a point where all particles fall in or does the event horizon and EM field form a sort of boundary, something else? $\endgroup$ – Jimmy G. Oct 9 '18 at 23:15
  • $\begingroup$ I think I get it... maybe. The part about Earth curving space time more than an event horizon is throwing me off. Can you explain that a little more? $\endgroup$ – Jimmy G. Oct 9 '18 at 23:17

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.