The book Mathematical Physics by Eugene Butkov has, on Chapter 8, the equation for a held string (by held I mean with endpoints fixed and both at the same height) as being $$T\frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial x^2}+F(x)-\rho(x)g=\rho(x)\frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial t^2},$$ where $T$ is the tension, $F$ an external force, $\rho$ the density, $g$ gravity and $u$ transversal (vertical) displacement.

However, the book derives this equation assuming the string deforms little from the horizontal position and the tension is contant. Such assumptions are strong, I think.

Plus, for the stationary case $\frac{\partial u}{\partial t}=0$ it doesn't seem to differentiate between a string hanging by its own weight and a string being pulled by a constant force. And we know these two situations are different since the solution for them is a catenary and a parabola, respectively.

What is the exact equation for a held string?

  • 1
    If you like this question you may also enjoy reading this Phys.SE post. – Qmechanic Apr 30 at 10:53
up vote 5 down vote accepted

Let $T(x)$ be the modulus of the tension and $T_x$, $T_y$ its horizontal and vertical components.

Suppose a small element of the string having length $ds=\sqrt{dx^2+dy^2}$. Since tension is the only horizontal force, we have $T_x(x)=T_x(x+dx)$ which says $T_x=T_0$ or $T(x)\cos(\theta)=T_0$.

The vertical tension difference is $T_y(x+dx)-T_y(x)=\frac{\partial T_y}{\partial x}dx$. But $T_y(x)=T(x)\sin(\theta)=T_0\tan\theta=T_0\frac{\partial y}{\partial x}$, so $T_y(x+dx)-T_y(x)=T_0\frac{\partial^2 y}{\partial x^2}dx$.

Net vertical force will be $T_0\frac{\partial^2 y}{\partial x^2}dx-F(x)dx-\rho g ds$, where $F(x)$ is assumed downwards. Notice how we take the force to be proportional to $dx$ and not $ds$, assuming it acts only on the horizontal breadth of the element. On the other hand, the mass is definitely proportional to $ds$.

Net force must equal mass times vertical acceleration, $\rho \frac{\partial^2 y}{\partial t^2}ds$.

This gives $$T_0\frac{\partial^2 y}{\partial x^2}dx-F(x)dx-\rho g ds=\rho \frac{\partial^2 y}{\partial t^2}ds.$$

Dividing out by $dx$, we get $$T_0\frac{\partial^2 y}{\partial x^2}-F(x)-\rho g \sqrt{1+\left(\frac{\partial y}{\partial x}\right)^2}=\rho \sqrt{1+\left(\frac{\partial y}{\partial x}\right)^2}\frac{\partial^2 y}{\partial t^2}.$$

I believe this is the exact equation. In the stationary regime, it does give a parabola for a constant force if we ignore the weight, and a catenary for no external force.

Notice however that it only reduces to the usual wave equation $T_0\frac{\partial^2 y}{\partial x^2}=\rho \frac{\partial^2 y}{\partial t^2}$ when we ignore the weight, set $F=0$ and also assume $\sqrt{1+\left(\frac{\partial y}{\partial x}\right)^2}\approx 1$.

The steady-state catenary arises when $F(x)=0$; the steady-state parabola arises when $F(x)\gg\rho(x)g$. (I just happened to be writing about this here.)

More generally, you could perform an force balance on a differential element of the string to obtain $$\frac{\partial\mathbf{T}(s,t)}{\partial s}+\mathbf{F}(s)-\rho(s)g\mathbf{k}=\rho(s)\frac{d^2 \mathbf{x}(t)}{d t^2}$$ where the parameters in bold are the tension vector $\mathbf{T}$, distributed force $\mathbf{F}(s)$, element position $\mathbf{x}$, and the unit vector $\mathbf{k}$ in the vertical direction and $s$ is the distance along the string. To this you must also add a relationship between $|\mathbf{T}(s)|$ and $ds$. If the string is inextensional, for example, then $s$ is constant. This governing equation is independent of endpoint location and can accommodate forces and displacements in any direction and for a curved string.

You may find this paper interesting: Yong, "Strings, Chains, and Ropes".

  • It took me some time to type my answer, so I didn't see yours. I would be happy to know what you think of it. – Marcel Apr 29 at 23:43
  • @Marcel I especially like how you emphasize that a distributed downward force acts over $dx$, whereas the self-weight acts over $ds$. In my equation above, one would have to take care to define $\mathbf{F}(s)$ properly so that the correct distributed force is applied regardless of the angle of the string. – Chemomechanics Apr 29 at 23:48
  • I think this is a better answer than the one by Marcel as it does not make use of $T_0$ and thus begs for a "string"-dependent constitutive relation. However, I suggest using a total time derivative rather than a partial one in the expression of the acceleration. – Hussein May 1 at 4:04
  • @Hussein Will do, thanks! – Chemomechanics May 1 at 18:01

Your Answer


By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.