2
$\begingroup$

How is the precise relationship between a Lagrangian and the (pre)symplectic structure?

Given a (pre)symplectic structure can I construct a (equivalence class of) Lagrangian(s)?

References are very welcome.

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

4
$\begingroup$
  1. Given a Lagrangian $L$, it is in principle possible to perform a (possible singular) Legendre transformation using e.g. the Faddeev-Jackiw method to arrive at a Hamiltonian Lagrangian of the form $$L_H(z,\dot{z},t)~=~\vartheta_I(z,t)~\dot{z}^I - H(z,t)\tag{6}$$ with a Hamiltonian $H$ and a pre-symplectic potential $$\vartheta~=~\vartheta_I(z,t)~\mathrm{d}z^I, \qquad \omega~:=~\mathrm{d}\vartheta. $$

  2. Conversely, given a Hamiltonian $H$ and a pre-symplectic potential $\vartheta$, the Hamiltonian Lagrangian (6) provides a Lagrangian formulation.

$\endgroup$
0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.