0
$\begingroup$

I was solving some questions from the book "Classical Mechanics - R. Douglas Gregory", when I faced this problem:

A car that is represented by a chassis which keeps contact with the road, connected to an upper mass $m$ by a spring and a damper. The car is moving with constant speed $c$ along a gently undulating road with profile $h(x)$, where $h'(x)$ is small. At time $t$ the upper mass has displacement $y(t)$ above it's equilibrium level. Show that, under suitable assumptions, $y$ satisfies a differential equation of the form:

$y'' +2Ky'+\Omega^2y = 2Kch'(ct)+ \Omega^2 h(ct)$ where $K$ and $\Omega$ are positive constants.

I could not reach this conclusion in my attempts, but reached a slightly different answer. So I checked the solution in the solutions book.

The solution is the following:

Since the undulation is small we suppose that the horizontal displacement of the car in $t$ is simply given by $x = ct$. The the extension $\Delta$ of the spring at the time $t$ is

$\Delta = y - h(ct) \implies \Delta' = y' - h'(ct)$

The equation of motion for the vertical oscillation of the car is therefore

$my'' = -\alpha\Delta -\beta\Delta'$

writing $\alpha = m\Omega^2$ and $\beta = 2mK$ you can reach the wanted differential equation.

The problem of my resolution was that instead of

$my'' = -\alpha\Delta -\beta\Delta'$

I used the equation

$m\Delta'' = -\alpha\Delta -\beta\Delta'$

And for me, my equation still makes more sense than the other. So I want to understand: Why I use $my''$, instead of the $m\Delta''$ that would make sense using the damped simple harmonic equation?

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

To make thing easier for me and possibly for you I have inverted the system as follows with $L$ as the length of the spring when in static equilibrium.

enter image description here

There seems to be agreement as to the two forces acting on the mass as $-\alpha \Delta$ and $-\beta \dot \Delta$ where $\Delta (= y-h)$ is the extension of the spring.

The author has then used Newton's second law which resulted in the equation of motion for the mass $$m\ddot y = -\alpha \Delta - \beta \dot \Delta$$.I have put a set of axes labelled 1 which are fixed relative to the ground which are used to measure distance $y$.

You have wanted to use $\ddot \Delta$ as the acceleration of the mass.
The problem with that is that you are measuring the extension $\Delta$ relative to a set of axes, labelled 2, which are pinned to a point on the spring $B'$ which is $L$ away from the point of support $A'$.
The problem with this is that set of axes is accelerating relative to the ground with an acceleration of $\ddot h$ and so in that accelerating frame of reference you cannot use Newton's laws directly.

This means that $$m\ddot \Delta \ne -\alpha \Delta - \beta \dot \Delta$$

However all is not lost as you could introduce a pseudo force of $-m\ddot h$ and then use Newton's laws to get

$$m\ddot \Delta = -\alpha \Delta - \beta \dot \Delta - m \ddot h \Rightarrow m\ddot y = -\alpha \Delta - \beta \dot \Delta$$ because $\ddot \Delta = \ddot y - \ddot h$

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks! I now get it why we need to use $m \ddot y$. But this raised another question. We use $-\beta \dot \Delta$ because of the damped spring. If the damping was caused, for example, by the air resistance. Then I should have used $-b\dot y$? $\endgroup$ – MrBr Apr 26 '18 at 23:05
  • $\begingroup$ @MrBr in a car the suspension damping is done by something like a piston and cylinder containing oil and the damping depends on the rate of change of the extension of the spring ie the speed of the mass relative to the oil. $\endgroup$ – Farcher Apr 27 '18 at 4:19

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.