0
$\begingroup$

In a four-vector field theory, we have a given Lagrangian: $$\mathscr{L} = C_{1} (\partial_{\nu} A_{\mu}) (\partial^{\nu} A^{\mu}) + C_2 (\partial_{\nu} A_{\mu}) (\partial^{\mu} A^{\nu}) + C_3 A_{\mu} A^\mu.$$ From that we should compute the canonical momentum: $$\pi_\nu = \frac{\partial \mathscr{L}}{\partial \partial_0A^\nu}.$$

My question here is:

Can someone please explain me how to take that derivative? Because I do not understand how to derivate these terms and I do not find an example where this is done for a 4-vector field explicitly.

$\endgroup$
0

2 Answers 2

1
$\begingroup$

Since this is very homework-like, a full solution should not be presented.

Nevertheless, OP seems to generally have confusion regarding all the 4-vector indices and seems to want a more detailed explanation.

For those reasons, I will show how to compute the derivative in great detail, for just part of the Lagrangian:

$$\mathscr{L}_1 = C_{1} (\partial_{\nu} A_{\mu}) (\partial^{\nu} A^{\mu})$$

Also, in order to avoid confusion between free and summed indices, I will compute $$ \frac{\partial \mathscr{L}_1}{\partial (\partial_0 A^\rho)}\;, $$ where I am using $\rho$ instead of $\nu$, since $\nu$ is already being used as a summed index in the Lagrangian.

First, rewrite $\mathscr{L}_1$ as: $$ C_1(\partial_{\nu} A^{\alpha}) g_{\mu\alpha}g^{\nu\beta} (\partial_{\beta} A^{\mu}) $$ so that all the derivatives have the lower index (just like in the derivative of the Lagrangian we are interested in) and all the fields have upper index.

Then use: $$ \frac{\partial \partial_\gamma A^{\delta}}{\partial \partial_0 A^{\rho}} = \delta^{0}_\gamma\delta^{\delta}_\rho $$

And use the product rule to see that: $$ \frac{\partial \mathscr{L}_1}{\partial (\partial_0 A^\rho)} =C_1\frac{\partial}{\partial (\partial_0 A^\rho)}\left((\partial_{\nu} A^{\alpha}) g_{\mu\alpha}g^{\nu\beta} (\partial_{\beta} A^{\mu})\right) $$ $$ =C_1\left( \delta^{0}_\nu\delta^{\alpha}_\rho g_{\mu\alpha}g^{\nu\beta}(\partial_{\beta} A^{\mu}) +(\partial_{\nu} A^{\alpha}) g_{\mu\alpha}g^{\nu\beta}\delta^{0}_\beta\delta^{\mu}_\rho \right) $$ $$ =C_1\left(\partial^0 A_\rho + \partial^0A_\rho\right) = 2C_1\partial^0 A_\rho $$

So, the final result: $$ \frac{\partial \mathscr{L}_1}{\partial (\partial_0 A^\rho)} = 2C_1\partial^0 A_\rho $$

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

There are two contributions to $\pi_\nu$, one each from the $C_i$ terms. The first term gives $2\partial^0 A_\nu$, since we can rewrite a term as $C_1\partial_\mu A^\nu \partial^\mu A_\nu$. (This uses a combination of index swapping and index-height changing.) And with a similar treatment of the last term, we arrive at $\pi_\nu =2(C_1\partial^0 A_\nu + C_2\partial_\nu A^0)$.

$\endgroup$
7
  • $\begingroup$ Okay thank you, can you please say me how you come to the solution of the first term? Because I really do not know how to compute these 4 derivatives. Maybe you can show me the full computation way in steps as a picture or something? That would be really helpful for my understanding :) $\endgroup$
    – Armani42
    Commented Apr 19, 2018 at 13:10
  • $\begingroup$ @Armani42 To differentiate $\partial_\mu A^\nu\partial^\mu A_\nu$ with respect to $\partial_0 A^\nu$, just use the project rule. The first factor gives $\delta_\mu^0$, so the contribution is $\partial^0 A_\nu$. The second factor gives $g^{\mu 0}$. giving another copy of the same result. It looks complicated, but it's just a variation on $\partial_x y^2 = 2x\partial_x y$. $\endgroup$
    – J.G.
    Commented Apr 19, 2018 at 13:39
  • $\begingroup$ so the first term with C1 I've been written out into a vector and differentiated it. But now I have a problem with the C2 term because there we have $(\partial_{nu} A_{mu})(\partial^{mu} A^{nu})$. So the indices of A and the derivatives are not the same anymore so how to deal with that? In the link I post, you can find a picture of how I calculated the C1 term: ibb.co/eMLoRn So if you look at the last vector, you see what I mean, I now have the $\partial_{mu}$ and then the $\partial^{nu}$ so my question: What has to be done that I can go on computing and come to your result(C2)? $\endgroup$
    – Armani42
    Commented Apr 20, 2018 at 8:11
  • $\begingroup$ @Armani42 Rewrite the term as $C_2\partial_\rho A_\mu\partial^\mu A^\rho$, so by the product rule the derivative is $C_2(\delta_\rho^0 \eta_{\mu\nu}\partial^\mu A^\rho+\partial_\rho A_\mu \eta^{\mu 0}\delta^\rho_\nu)$. Simplify that. $\endgroup$
    – J.G.
    Commented Apr 20, 2018 at 8:14
  • $\begingroup$ okay, thank you but how can I write that into my 4-vector on the picture? I just want to make it in detail that I really understand what is going on. $\endgroup$
    – Armani42
    Commented Apr 20, 2018 at 8:18

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.