An electron is released between fixed charged parallel plates. The seperation between the plates is small compared to the dimensions of each plate so that we consider the electric field to be uniform. Does it create electromagnetic wave because of acceleration? How does the energy conservation take place in this situation?
$\begingroup$
$\endgroup$
Add a comment
|
2 Answers
$\begingroup$
$\endgroup$
2
The electron will accelerate, which, roughly speaking, will create an increasing magnetic field and therefore an electromagnetic wave.
As the electron is moving, its initial potential energy is being converted to the kinetic energy and some of it will be lost to the radiation.
Once the electron hits a positively charged plate (because that's where it would obviously end up), its kinetic energy will be transformed, roughly speaking, to heat.
Presumably, the electron was initially placed between the plates by some external force, so we can say that it got its initial potential energy (eventually lost to the radiation and heat), as it was moved to this position.
The change of the electrostatic energy of the system before the electron was moved to its initial position and after it has landed on the positive plate, depends on where this electron came from.
For instance, if the electron was taken from the positive plate, the potential energy was added to the system and then lost, so the final electrostatic energy of the system would be the same as it was before the whole experiment had started.
If the electron was taken from the negative plate, some energy was lost as the electron was moved into its initial position between the plates and some more energy was lost as the electron completed its trip to the positive plate, moving on its own. In this case the final electrostatic energy of the system would be lower than it was before the experiment. We can say that it was slightly discharged.
If the electron was moved in from the outside, the final electrostatic energy of the system would also be lowered because, at the end of the experiment, the charge on the positive plate will be reduced. The exact sequence of energy changes, in this case, depends on the initial position of the electron.
For illustration purposes, let's look at three basic subcases: A) initial position is in the middle of the gap B) initial position is quarter gap above the neutral line C) initial position is quarter gap below the neutral line
Let's assume that the voltage between the plates is 1V. So, it takes 1eV to move an electron from the positive plate to the negative or 1eV is released (to radiation and heat), when an electron moves from the negative plate to the positive.
The diagrams below show that the introduction of the electron into the system, could leave its energy unchanged (case A), increase it (case B) or decrease it (case C).
In case A, the electron is moved normal to the electric field lines and therefore no work is performed by the system or on the system and, therefore, the energy of the system does not change.
In case B, the electrons is moved into the field, i.e., it has to be pushed in by an external force, which performs the work, and therefore the energy of the system (which now includes the new electron) increases. Based on the position of the electron between the plates, quarter gap above the neutral line, the energy of the system has increased by 0.25eV.
In case C, the electron is moved against the field, i.e., it is pulled by the field, i.e., the system performs some work and, therefore the system loses some energy. Based on the position of the electron between the plates, quarter gap below the neutral line, the energy of the system has decreased by 0.25eV.
As illustrated in the diagrams, the energy loss of the system after the electron has been released depends on the initial position of the electron, but in the end, the total loss of energy by the system, in comparison with its energy before the electron has been introduced, is the same 0.5eV in all three cases and could be calculated based on the fact that the system ended up with one unit of charge less on the positive plate.
NOTE: In the case when the electron was taken from the negative plate and ended up on the positive plate, the charge on both plates was reduced by one unit or, assuming that the voltage in that case was 1V, the energy loss would be 1eV.
-
$\begingroup$ Thank you very much for this wonderful explanation. I want to ask you a follow up question if that is okay. In the scenario where we put the electron there by some external force, during its journey till the positive plate, its potential energy was lost to radiation and heat. Is that also the same amount of energy lost by the system? (reduced electrostatic energy of the system in the last paragraph.) $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 19, 2018 at 18:05
-
$\begingroup$ I've added more details and diagrams related to the last scenario, when the electron is moved to the system from the outside. Hopefully, it will clarify things for you. $\endgroup$– V.F.Commented Apr 20, 2018 at 4:12
$\begingroup$
$\endgroup$
In the scenario where we take electron from the positive plate, you say potential energy of the system before and potential energy of the system after it hits the negative plate are the same. So the work done by the external force to take the electron near the negative plate is equal to the electron energy that will be lost to radiation and heat. Is that correct? Note: I have clicked answer button instead of comment, it was not on purpose. I couldn't find a way to delete this. Sorry about that.