0
$\begingroup$

As referred to this question Why can't charge be in a stable equilibrium in electrostatic field?, it is given that

Fig. 5–1.If $P_0$ were a position of stable equilibrium for a positive charge, the electric field everywhere in the neighbourhood would point toward $P_0$. Consider a tiny imaginary surface that encloses $P_0$, as in Fig. 5–1. If the electric field everywhere in the vicinity is pointed toward $P_0$, the surface integral of the normal component is certainly not zero. For the case shown in the figure, the flux through the surface must be a negative number. But Gauss’ law says that the flux of electric field through any surface is proportional to the total charge inside. If there is no charge at $P_0$, the field we have imagined violates Gauss’ law. It is impossible to balance a positive charge in empty space—at a point where there is not some negative charge. A positive charge can be in equilibrium if it is in the middle of a distributed negative charge. Of course, the negative charge distribution would have to be held in place by other than electrical forces.

Please explain the part which is denoted in bold. I have tried to comprehend the idea but did not get anything. My question is why the integral will be negative. I was also reading about this in the book Basic Laws of Electromagnetism, I encountered the same problem where is written:

the flux of E through the surface S is negative

Any help will be appreciated.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ You want to revisit the meaning of a surface integral. This might help. $\endgroup$ – the boy who believed Apr 18 '18 at 8:17
  • $\begingroup$ @theboywhobelieved, it did not help me to understand my problem, it will be very helpful if you give me some clue to understanding the matter. $\endgroup$ – Chandramauli Chakraborty Apr 18 '18 at 8:29
0
$\begingroup$

You have to understand that flux is determined by directional quantities. It describes a quantity that passes through an area. Obviously, it will make a difference in which direction the quantity passes through that area.

Consider the following example: You have an arbitrary surface $S$ and a quantity $\vec{F}$ that points through it. You can calculate the flux $\Phi$ by integrating the quantity $\vec{F}$ over the area of the surface $S$. The quantity has a direction and the surface is oriented. You end up with: $\Phi_1 = \int_S \vec{F}\cdot d\vec{A}$

If you now reverse the direction of the quantity, $\vec{F}$ becomes $-\vec{F}$ and you will obtain a minus sign in your flux: $\Phi_2 = -\int_S \vec{F}\cdot d\vec{A}$.

Do you agree that if the flux is non-zero, either $\Phi_1$ or $\Phi_2$ have to be negative? enter image description here

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.