Consider a system of interacting electrons. Using the path integral formalism, we introduce the Hubbard Stratonovich transformation to decouple the interaction in the density channel. Then, we integrate out the fermionic degrees of freedom and extremize the action. The new effective action involves a term of the form $$ \ln\left(-\hat G^{-1}\right) + \ln\left(1 - i\hat G\hat\phi\right)\,, $$ where $\hat G$ is the diagonal bare propagator for the electrons and $\hat\phi$ is the auxiliary field. The first term just gives the partition function for the non-interacting system. The trace of the second term can be expanded as $$ \mathrm{tr} \sum_n \frac{\left(-i\hat G\hat\phi\right)^n}{n}\,. $$ The first term is $$ \mathrm{tr}\left(\hat G\hat\phi\right) = \phi_0\sum_n G_n\,, $$ where $G_n$ is the diagonal element of the propagator matrix.

The second term is $$ \sum_q \phi_q \phi_{-q}\left(\sum_p G_p G_{p+q}\right)\,. $$ The stuff inside the parentheses is the RPA polarization bubble. So far so good.

The third term becomes $$ \sum_{kp}\phi_k\phi_p\phi_{-k-p}\left(\sum_qG_qG_{k+q}G_{q-p}\right)\,. $$ This is a triangular loop diagram. Intuitively, it seems that it should cancel. Odd powers just seem, well, odd. In fact, consulting Altland and Simons book (second edition, after Eq.(6.6)), it does say that the odd powers cancel by symmetry. However, I don't see it. Am I missing something obvious?

Thank you


Since I can't comment (not enough reputation), I'll attempt a quick answer.

Altland and Simons make several comments about symmetry cancellation in a variety of sections. Let us proceed by deduction, if nothing else. In the present example, either the auxiliary field or the Green's function components must be antisymmetric with respect to momentum; $G_{-k} = -G_k$ or $\phi_{-k} = -\phi_k$.

From what little I know of Green functions, they are positive definite, which is true in any basis (momentum or otherwise). Therefore the auxiliary field must be antisymmetric with respect to the momentum variable; perhaps one can derive this property from conservation of momentum.

This answer may be way off; if so, please correct me!


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.