0
$\begingroup$

We all know that monochromatic light is always polarised. Non-monochromatic light can obviously also be linearly polarised. However, can non-monochromatic light be elliptically or circularly polarised?

Improve this question
$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ all satellite communications and some radar signals are circularly polarized, these are always modulated and not monochromatic. $\endgroup$
    – hyportnex
    Apr 13, 2018 at 23:34
  • $\begingroup$ There is no such thing as monochromatic light and so the comment that is it always polarised doesn't matter. Also linearly polarised light can be expressed as a superposition of circularly polarised light and visa versa so fundamentally they are the same. $\endgroup$
    – MJC
    Apr 19, 2018 at 9:31

2 Answers 2

Reset to default
2
$\begingroup$

Yes. The two images in a 3D cinema are left- and right-handed circularly polarized.

If you have a pair of such 3D-glasses, it is fun to look in a mirror, and close your right eye or your left eye.

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$
1
0
$\begingroup$

There's some subtleties around the edges of this question, but the short answer is yes.

Non-monochromatic light is made up of some combination (which might be coherent or incoherent) of light of a range of different frequencies. If each component of that combination is circularly polarized, then we say that the combination is circularly polarized.

  • If the combination is coherent, then it is a linear superposition that forms some form of pulse, in which case the field shape rotates with time; see e.g. this paper for a recent example.

  • If the combination is incoherent, then it becomes quite hard to say anything about the detailed time dependence of the pulse, which will generally be a mess, but it will tend to rotate in the specified direction.

In either case, to actually make a non-monochromatic circular polarization, you need a quarter-wave plate as usual -- except that the plate will need to add exactly a quarter-wavelength of optical path to each wavelength, which can't be achieved with a plate of constant birefringence $\Delta n$. Instead, what's needed is an achromatic waveplate whose birefringence $\Delta n$ changes with wavelength in precisely the right way; this is mostly doable over limited frequency ranges, but it gets more and more challenging (and expensive) as the bandwidth of interest increases.

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ What about elliptical polarisation? $\endgroup$
    – user148792
    Apr 15, 2018 at 11:49
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @delickcrow123 The same, but more complicated, and there's generally less point to using such fields. (One such complication: what if you have two components of the same ellipticity, but with different orientations of the polarization ellipse?) Here is one example with an elliptically-polarized non-monochromatic broadband pulse (and see here for a more accessible review), so they can definitely be useful, but I generally see little point in invoking them unless you really need them. $\endgroup$
    – Emilio Pisanty
    Apr 15, 2018 at 12:44

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.