0
$\begingroup$

I happened to come across the following term while doing an excercise on perturbation theory

\begin{equation} H^2=J^2\sum_{<i,j>}\sum_{<k,l>}\sigma_i\ \sigma_j\ \sigma_k\ \sigma_l \end{equation}

Where $H$ is the Ising Hamiltonian, $J$ is the coupling constant, $\sigma_I=\pm1$ and $<i,j>$ means sum over neighbouring sites.

When computing the mean value $\langle H^2 \rangle$

\begin{equation} \langle H^2\rangle=J^2\frac{1}{Z}\sum_{\{\sigma\}}e^{-\beta H}\sum_{<i,j>}\sum_{<k,l>}\sigma_i\ \sigma_j\ \sigma_k\ \sigma_l \end{equation}

I started to wonder if every term in this sum is non-zero. for example, terms where $i=k, j=l$ give a contribution of $2J^2N$ because $\sigma_i \sigma_j \sigma_k \sigma_l=1$ and one is left out with a sum over pairs of sites. Using the fact that $\sum_{\sigma=-1}^1\sigma^2=2$ and $\sum_{\sigma=-1}^1\sigma=0$ is there any argument to determine if some combinations of $i,j,k,l$ don't contribute to the mean value?

Edit: I would be really interested in knowing, for example, how much this term is

\begin{equation} \langle H^2\rangle_{i=j}= J^2\frac{1}{Z}\sum_{\{\sigma\}}e^{-\beta H}\sum_{<i,j>}\sum_{<k,l>}\sigma_i\ \sigma_j\ \sigma_k\ \sigma_l\ \delta_{ik} \end{equation}

$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ I don't understand the question. What do you mean by "this term is zero"? Each term is a function of the spin configuration, not a number... $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 4, 2018 at 7:12
  • $\begingroup$ you are right! Sorry for the misunderstunding, I meant that the mean value is zero. Let me edit. $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 4, 2018 at 14:46
  • $\begingroup$ OK, then all the expectations $\langle \sigma_i\sigma_j\sigma_k\sigma_l\rangle$ are strictly positive (as long as $\beta>0$). This follows, for example, from the GKS correlation inequalities. The latter imply that $\langle\sigma_i\sigma_j\sigma_k\sigma_l\rangle \geq \langle\sigma_i\sigma_j\rangle \langle\sigma_k\sigma_l\rangle$. Now, for any $i,j$ neighbors, $\langle\sigma_i\sigma_j\rangle \geq \tanh(\beta J) > 0$ for all $\beta>0$. $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 4, 2018 at 14:57
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks! I edited to add a small new question, if you have any clue on how to compute that particular mean value that would be great! thanks! $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 5, 2018 at 5:25
  • $\begingroup$ The term you are interested in will scale linearly with the number of spins in the system. The exact constant is probably impossible to determine, except in dimensions $1$ and $2$. Note, however, that $\langle H^2\rangle$ scales as the square of the number of spins, so the term you are interested in contributes negligibly to this expectation. $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 5, 2018 at 5:49

0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.